Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(1); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.040120.

A Cognitive Study on the Categorization and Translation of Chinese Synonymous Double Classifier Constructions

Author(s)

Jinhai Wang, Fengxiang Yang

Corresponding Author:
Jinhai Wang
Affiliation(s)

Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou, China

Abstract

Based on BCC corpus, with the help of Collostructional Analysis and Fisher Exact Test, this study calculates and analyzes the collostructional strength of “Noun” lexeme in Chinese synonymous double classifier constructions “X shuang/dui/fu-N”, with the aim of investigating the semantic hierarchy of “N”, prototypical meaning of each construction and their cognitive motivation respectively. The research findings are as follows: 1) classifier constructions “X shuang/dui/fu-N” share both similarities and significant differences in terms of collocation and categorization extension mechanism. 2) there exists an extension mechanism of metonymy in the extension of classifier constructions “X shuang/dui/fu-N” in addition to the four types of construction categorization extension mechanism proposed by Goldberg, namely, the polysemy links, the subpart links, instance links, and metaphorical links. 3) Though both metaphor and metonymy play an essential role in the extension of classifier constructions “X shuang/dui/fu-N”, yet the metonymy mechanism is more fundamental.

Keywords

Double Classifier Construction; Categorization; Translation; Cognitive Mechanism

Cite This Paper

Jinhai Wang, Fengxiang Yang. A Cognitive Study on the Categorization and Translation of Chinese Synonymous Double Classifier Constructions. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 1: 110-120. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.040120.

References

[1] Barcelona.A.2003.On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor.In A.Barcelona (ed.).Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

[2] Duan, Yucai. 1988. Anotation on Origin of Chinese Characters.Shanghai:Ancient Works Press.

[3] Fillmore, C. Frame semantics.In the Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.).Linguistics in the Morning Calm.Seoul: Hanshin, 1982.

[4] Fillmore, C.Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica,15(2): 109-115.

[5] Gries, S.,B.Hampe & D.Schnefeld.2010.Converging evidence II: More on the association of verbs and constructions. In S.Rice & J.Newman ( eds.) .Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive /Functional Research.Stanford: CSLI

[6] Gries, S.2011.Corpus data in usage-based linguistics.In M.Brdar, S.Gries & M.Fuchs (eds.) .Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

[7] Goldberg, A.1995 .Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

[8] Goldberg, A.E. 2006. Construction at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

[9] Ibñez, R., F.José & O.Velasco.2003.High-level metonymy and linguistic structure. I n C .Inchaurralde & C .Florén (eds.).Interaction and Cognition in Linguistics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang .189-210.

[10] Kuang,Xin.2015.Study on “shuang”、“dui”、“fu”.Chinese Journal24:42-43.

[11] Lv, Shuxiang. 1999. Modern Chinese Eight Hundred Words.Beijing:Commercial Press.

[12] Radden.G.How metonymic are metaphors.In A.Barcelona(ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroad. Berlin/New York:Mouton de Groyter.2000:93-108.

[13] Song, Juanjuan. 2010. Study on “shuang”、“dui”、“fu”. Journal of Shanxi Normal University37: 104-106.

[14] Stefanowitsch,A.& S.Gries.2003.Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,(2): 209-243.

[15] Talmy Leonard.Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2000:259-260.

[16] Talmy Leonard.Toward a cognitive semantics.Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2012.

[17] Wang, Chunling. 2005. Study on “shuang”and“dui”. Journal of Ningxia University1: 33-36.

[18] Wang, Li. 1980.History of Chinese.Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

[19] Wang, Suping. 2005. Comparision between “shuang”and “dui”. Journal of Yunnan Normal University4: 57-59.

[20] Wang, Yin. 2007. Cognitive Linguisitics.Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

[21] Weng,Zhenshan.2010.Comparative Study on “shuang”、“dui”、“fu”.Chinese Journal3:89-90.

[22] Xu, Shen. 1963. Origin of Chinese Characters.Beijing:ZHONGHUA Book Company.

[23] Zhang, Yiwei& Liang, Jun. 2015. An analysis of the semantic features of homologous classifiers. Modern Chinese 7: 134-136.

[24] Zong,Shouyun. 2012. Cognitive Study on Chinese Classifiers.Beingjing:Ancient Works Press.