As a socio-professional subject, youth have the most diverse social roles and social needs. Youth attention and participation in community governance can help innovate new models of community governance, improve the concept and efficiency of community governance, and realize modern community governance. This study establishes a hypothesis model based on the analysis of similar related literature and practical research. Sixteen influencing factors of community governance satisfaction among young residents were extracted from four dimensions, including community governance services and performance, community participation, the role of community education, and interpersonal interaction in the community, and the reliability test and correlation analysis were conducted by SPSS to further determine the dimensional division, and the model was validated using AMOS software to finally determine the influence of each dimension on community governance satisfaction among young residents. It was found that, overall, community governance service and performance, community participation and community interpersonal interaction were significantly and positively related to youth residents' community governance satisfaction; community education had no significant effect on satisfaction, but it could influence satisfaction through community governance service and performance and community interaction. Therefore, the four aspects are to improve the level of community governance and enhance the satisfaction of community governance of young residents from the party building leading to promote the collaborative governance of multiple subjects, develop online and offline linkage community participation, strengthen the function of community education governance methods and expand community interaction space.

Xueyan Zhang, Hejie Lu. A Study on the Factors Influencing Youth Residents' Satisfaction with Community Governance--Based on the Empirical Analysis of N City. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 3: 89-101. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.040315.

[1] Yu Yanghang. Urban community public services, life satisfaction and residents' sense of access. Northwest Population, 2021, 42(03):78-90.

[2] Zhang P, Wu ZJ, Zhao Meng. The development trend and evaluation of urban community governance research in China--a bibliometric analysis based on 2049 CSSCI articles (1998-2017). Governance Research, 2019, 35(01):21-30.

[3][24] Gao Hong,Sun Baicai. Community publicness measurement dimensions and community governance performance-an empirical analysis based on Q city. Dongyue Series, 2021, 42(06): 104-113+191-192.

[4] Ye Jihong. Governance capacity of farm-to-household communities: dimensions, influencing factors and improvement path. Zhongzhou Journal, 2021(02):59-65.

[5] Wang Haitao. Community governance structure and structural governance: framework, mechanism and impact. Seeking the truth,2021(03):36-50+110.

[6] Deng Yuanyuan,Cao Xiaojin,Feng Shanshan. A study on the factors influencing the satisfaction of residents in unit communities based on HLM model--Xuzhou City as an example. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science Edition),2021,57(01):118-125.

[7] Zhang Xia Ni. The path of youth volunteers' participation in green governance and their own growth. China Youth Social Science,2021,40(03):63-70.

[8] Fornell C , Johnson M D , Anderson E W , et al. The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 1996, 60(4):7-18.

[9] Yang, X. Y., Gao, H.. Research on community type, social capital and community governance performance. Beijing Social Science, 2020(03):78-89.

[10] Wang, H.. Community governance structure and structural governance: framework, mechanism and impact. Seeking the truth,2021(03):36-50+110.

[11] Gao Hong. Factors influencing the effectiveness of community creation and the path to achieve it: a qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy sets based on 38 urban community creation cases. Social Science,2021(09):79-90.

[12] Liu Shuai-shun, Zhang Ruli. Embedded governance: an explanatory framework for social organizations' participation in community governance. Theory Monthly,2020(05):122-131.

[13][22] Huang Qing,Xu Yajing. Research on community safety perception and residents' happiness. Shandong Social Science,2021(06):72-79.

[14] Wu C Q, Wang K, Chen W, Yang Y D, Ren G Y, Chen Q R, Luo X, Su L Q, Cheng Y Y, Li Qun F, Mao M R, Liu Y L, Liu J Y, Wang S F, Li P R, Zhao M. "Innovative Thinking on the Refined Governance of Community Space". Journal of Urban Planning, 2020 (03): 1-14.

[15] Li Xiaozhuang. New exploration of community governance by serving party members. Frontline, 2020 (11):83-85.

[16] Yung C, Chen C-Y. What makes community participation sustainable? --A political-social analysis of party building in grassroots building groups in Shanghai. China Governance Review, 2021(02):75-89.

[17] Ye Jihong. Governance capacity of farm-to-city communities: dimensions, influencing factors and improvement path. Zhongzhou Journal, 2021(02):59-65.

[18] Wang Wen. Strengthening community education to promote the modernization of community governance in the new era. China Administration, 2021(03):155-156.

[19] Li Dongquan. Conditions, mechanisms and paths of community governance for citizenship in the new urbanization process. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition),2021,32(03):82-91.

[20] Zhang Chunlong, Dong Xuran, Liu Jianhui. Research on youth participation in urban and rural community governance in Jiangsu. Vaishi,2021(08):41-44.

[21] Gao Zhimin. Toward intersection:On community governance and community education. Education Development Research,2015,35(23):67-76.

[23] Li Xiaoyu. Community emotion: the construction of a new rural community governance community [D]. Tianjin University of Technology,2021.

[25] Liu W, Weng JF. The formation logic and main types of semi-embedded interactive governance: an example of the operation of property committees and property management in four communities in H street. Theory and Reform,2021(01):50-61+151-152.

[26] [33] Li Ding. Hierarchy and cumulative development of community participation: the case of Huitian area in Beijing. Social Construction,2021, 8(03): 48-60.

[27] Cheng Xianping. Mechanisms and strategies of integrating community education into community governance . Journal of Hebei Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2017, 19(03):67-71.

[28] Liu Ziyue,Leng Xiangming,Ding Qiuju. Soft power:An empirical study on the capacity development of community education embedded in social organizations. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition),2019,34(06):10-18+27.

[29] Li Xiaoting,Dou Ruina. Optimizing community governance with community education. People's Forum,2019(18):78-79.

[30] Shi Yaoyao,Song Yuping. Familiar strangers: community interpersonal relationships and their mobilization strategies in the context of online socialization . Hubei Social Science,2021(04):42-48.

[31] Gao Hong,Sun Baicai. Influencing factors and cultivation paths of community consciousness under the perspective of emotional governance. Journal of Anhui Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2020,48(05):95-104.

[32] Zhu Lingjun, Wang Youming, Liang Daogang. Adhering to the leadership of party building to enhance the effectiveness of common governance . People's Forum,2021(24):101-103.

[34] Wu Zunmin, Jiang Guiyou. Rethinking the function of community education in the context of public crisis--based on the perspective of community governance. Education Research,2020,41(10):92-101.

[35] Wu Hailin, Cheng Ru. Towards a "composite society" empowered by intelligent community construction: a case study of "Thirteen Communities" from the perspective of spatial sociology. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2021(04):85-96.

[36] Liu Zilin, Wang Xiaomeng, Ma Jing. Mechanisms of the influence of public space on neighborhood interaction in Beijing communities in transition:A comparative analysis of local residents and immigrants. Geoscience,2020,40(01):69-78.DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.01.009.