Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(4); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.040409.

Research on the Self-determination Right of Biometric Information in Taiwan, China

Author(s)

Bingwen Lou

Corresponding Author:
Bingwen Lou
Affiliation(s)

Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212013, China

Abstract

The right of self-determination of personal information refers to the right of individual citizens to decide when, where and how their information is obtained, stored and used, as well as restrictions on other aspects. The right of self-determination plays an important role in the protection of biometric information. This paper will deeply explore the emergence and connotation of the right of self-determination. At the same time, through the introduction and analysis of the right of self-determination in Taiwan, China's personal data protection law, this paper discusses the legal system of the right of self-determination in the protection of biometric information, especially how to give full play to the key role of individuals in information protection with the hope to further improve China's personal information protection law.

Keywords

Biometric information, Right to self-determination, Personal data protection act, Enlightenment

Cite This Paper

Bingwen Lou. Research on the Self-determination Right of Biometric Information in Taiwan, China. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 4: 46-49. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.040409.

References

[1] Qiu Renzong, Huang Wen, Zhai Xiaomei (2014). Ethical issues of big data technology [J]. Science and society, no.1,pp. 36-48.

[2] Xu Xiangdong (2007) Self, others and Morality -- an introduction to Moral Philosophy [J]. China book review, no.5,pp.76.

[3] Liu Yue (2016). On property rights protection of biometric information [J]. Law and business research, Vol. 33 ,no.6,pp.73-82.

[4] Li Fei (2012). Changes, problems and Enlightenment of Taiwan, China's "personal data protection law" [J]. Xiamen University Law Review, pp.270-297.