Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(4); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.040412.

Legal Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Heilongjiang Local Development

Author(s)

Fang Wang

Corresponding Author:
Fang Wang
Affiliation(s)

Law School of China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088, China

Abstract

Korean citizens in Heilongjiang Province have very rich intangible cultural heritage resources. However, with the acceleration of economic globalization and the development of modernization, many valuable non-material resources of the Korean cultural heritage in Heilongjiang Province have been affected. Even the danger disappeared. Purpose of this article: Constructive legal suggestions for the protection of Heilongjiang's intangible cultural heritage, and at the same time, it can also promote local economic development. The research method of this article: statistically record the data through the Internet survey method, literature research method, questionnaire survey method and field survey method. The final research data showed that the tertiary industry accounted for an important proportion of the local economic development in Heilongjiang Province. The tertiary industry grew by 6.4%, the growth of the first and second industries were 3.7% and 2.1%, and the three major industrial structures were 18.3: 24.6: 57.1. The development of the tertiary industry economy has also promoted employment in this industry and increased the employment rate of the local people. The number of local tertiary industry employment has increased from 4.791 million in 2009 to 6.312 million in 2019. in conclusion: we can increase the investment in the tertiary industry and integrate the local non-legacy culture well with the local tourism industry. While protecting the non-legacy culture, it can also promote the economic development of Heilongjiang.

Keywords

Intangible Cultural Heritage, Legal Protection, Heilongjiang Development, Inheritance Protection

Cite This Paper

Fang Wang. Legal Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Heilongjiang Local Development. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 4: 71-81. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.040412.

References

[1] Noor Aziah Mohd Ariffin, Nurul Ain Osri, Nurul Hamiruddin Salleh. Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) of Cocos Malays in Tawau, Sabah. Advanced Science Letters, 2017, 23(7):6272-6276.

[2] D M Zhu. General survey and protection of intangible cultural heritage in traditional medicine in Zhejiang Province. Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi, 2017, 47(4):226-229.

[3] Szilárd Sztranyiczki. Property Law in the New Romanian Civil Code. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae European & Regional Studies, 2017, 10(1):107-119.

[4] J.Y. Stern. The essential structure of property law. Michigan Law Review, 2017, 115(7):1167-1212.

[5] Lucas Lixinski. Food as Heritage and Multi-Level International Legal Governance. International Journal of Cultural Property, 2019, 25(4):469-490.

[6] Se Ho Cho, Hyun Gon Kim. Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Technological Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Internationalization. Multinational Business Review, 2017, 25(4):00-00.

[7] KEIR WADDINGTON. Healthy Boundaries: Property, Law, and Public Health in England and Wales, 1815-1872. By James G. Hanley. University of Rochester Press. Boydell. 2016. xi + 257pp. £95.00. History, 2019, 103(354):169-171.

[8] Shaimaa Lazem, Susan Dray. Baraza! Human-computer interaction education in Africa. Interactions, 2019, 25(2):74-77.

[9] Ilaria Viarengo. Choice of law agreements in property regimes, divorce, and succession: stress-testing the new EU Regulations. Era Forum, 2017, 17(4):1-12.

[10] Tarek Teba, Dimitris Theodossopoulos. Reconstituting historical stratigraphy: Ugarit’s Temple of Dagan. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2019, 9(4):468-485.

[11] Krupa Rajangam, M B Rajani. Applications of Geospatial Technology in the Management of Cultural Heritage Sites – Potentials and Challenges for the Indian Region. Current Science, 2017, 113(10):1948-1960.

[12] Allan W. Solon and the Rhetoric of Stasis. Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada, 2019, 1015(1):113-129.

[13] Helberger, Natali, Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik, Reyna, Agustin. The Perfect Match? A Closer Look at the Relationship between EU Consumer Law and Data Protection Law. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017, 54(5):1427-1465.

[14] Ayla Joncheere. Kalbeliya Dance from Rajasthan: Invented Gypsy Form or Traditional Snake Charmers’ Folk Dance?. Dance Research Journal, 2017, 49(1):37-54.

[15] Rashmirekha Sarma. The Story of Tapyo: The Alkaline Salt Substitute of the Apatanis of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Culture Agriculture Food & Environment, 2017, 39(1):58-62.

[16] Kenneth Guang-Lih Huang. Uncertain intellectual property conditions and knowledge appropriation strategies: Evidence from the genomics industry. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2017, 26(1):41-71.

[17] HolliganBonnie. Ownership and Obligation: Restitution, Vindication and the Recovery of Moveables in Stair's Institutions. Edinburgh Law Review, 2017, 21(2):169-191.

[18] Antonio Saravia, Gustavo J. Canavire-Bacarreza, Fernando Rios-Avila. Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Freedom. Global Economy Journal, 2017, 13(1):1161-91.

[19] Zech H. Building a European Data Economy. Iic International Review of Intellectual Property & Competition Law, 2017, 48(5):501-503.

[20] Habitat Ltd. and Abraham Meirovitz v. CAFOT, Habitat International S.A., Habitat Design International and Carmel Holdings Ltd. Trademark Ordinance, Sec. Paris Convention, Sec. “Habitat”. Iic International Review of Industrial Property & Copyright Law, 2019, 50(6):1-6.

[21] Art. Levola Hengelo BV v. Smilde Foods BV Directive. “Levola Hengelo”. IIC; international review of industrial property and copyright law, 2019, 50(3):1-1.

[22] Wang R, Li J B, Wang Z Y. [General situation and comprehensive utilization of medicinal fungi resources in Heilongjiang province. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, 2017, 42(7):1277-1280.

[23] Kalpana Tyagi. Four-to-Three Telecoms Mergers: Substantial Issues in EU Merger Control in the Mobile Telecommunications Sector. IIC; international review of industrial property and copyright law, 2019, 49(3):1-36.

[24] Jeremy M. Wilson. The future of brand protection: responding to the global risk. Journal of Brand Management, 2017, 24(3):1-13.

[25] WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. U.S.C.,. “WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical”. IIC; international review of industrial property and copyright law, 2019, 49(9):1-3.

[26] Mantrov, V. . (2014). The place of indications of geographical origin in the intellectual property system. Springer International Publishing.

[27] Clarke, A. C., & Kohler, P. (2005). Property law: commentary and materials. Cambridge University Press(2006).

[28] Nicol, & Dianne. (2002). Intellectual property Commentary and Materials [book review]. Journal of Law & Information Science, 13.

[29] Huang, G. L., & Li, J. (2012). Transnational Intellectual Property Strategies and Firms' Knowledge Adoption: Evidence from China-U.S. patent dyads. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business.

[30] Botta, M. , & Wiedemann, K. . (2019). The Interaction Of Eu Competition, Consumer, And Data Protection Law In The Digital Economy: The Regulatory Dilemma In The Facebook Odyssey. The Antitrust Bulletin, 64(3), 428-446.