Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2019, 1(3); doi: 10.25236/FSST.20190306.

Research on Natural Disasters’ impact of China’s Economic Growth and Loss Compensation mechanism

Author(s)

Xinran Song

Corresponding Author:
Xinran Song
Affiliation(s)

University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

Abstract

Natural disasters happen frequently in China, with a wide range and a large impact. The results of the panel data regression model show that total natural disasters do not have great influences on China's economic growth. However, the impact of specific types of different disasters on economic growth is more obvious and has large differences. There have been various types of severe losses caused by natural disasters in China but with a downward trend in recent years. The reason is that China has made breakthroughs in pre-disaster defense and post-disaster emergency response. It’s important to start with improving the loss compensation mechanism for a further solution of reducing its economic impact.

Keywords

natural disasters; economic growth; loss compensation

Cite This Paper

Xinran Song. Research on Natural Disasters’ impact of China’s Economic Growth and Loss Compensation mechanism. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2019) Vol. 1 Issue 3: 36-42. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.20190306.

References

[1] Dercon S(2004). Growth and shocks: Evidence from rural Ethiopia,Journal of Development Economics,vol.74, no.2, pp.309~329.
[2]Rasmussen(2004). Macroeconomic Implications of Natural Disasters in the Caribbean Tobias N.
[3]Noy(2008). The macroeconomic consequences of disasters. Journal of Development Economics, no.2, pp.5.
[4]Skidmore, M. and Toya, H(2002). Do Natural Disasters Promote Long-Run Growth? Economic Inquiry, no.40, pp. 664-687.
[5]Okuyama Y (2003). Economics of natural disasters: A critical review Research Paper, no.12, PP.20~22.
[6]Noy, Ilan and Eduardo Cavallo(2011). The Economics of Natural Disasters : A Survey, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, no.51, pp. 63-102.