International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(5); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.040518.
Gang He
Institute of International Relations, China Foreign Affairs University, Center for Strategic and Security Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
International cooperation is an important topic in the study of international relations. This paper reviews and composes the existing research theories on international cooperation, focusing on new and recent theoretical developments, and develops a critical research review of these theories.
International cooperation, International system, Collaborative research, Critical studies
Gang He. The Dynamics of International Cooperation-A Research Agenda. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 5: 101-106. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.040518.
[1] Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson and Duncan Snidal, “The rational design of international institutions,” International Organization, Vol.55, No.4, 2001, pp.761-799.
[2] Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics，Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998, pp.203—206.
[3] Barry Buzan, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp.222-227.
[4] Anthony Giddens, Central Issues in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Press, 2015 edition, p. 141.
[5] Jennifer Mitzen, “Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security Dilemma,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol.12, No.3, pp.341-370.
[6] Mancur Olson, “Increasing the Incentives for International Cooperation,” International Organization, Vol.25, No.4, 1971, pp.866-874.
[7] Peter A. Hall and Rosemary C. R. Taylor, “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism,” Political Studies, 1996, pp.936-957.
[8] Paul Pierson, Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton University Press:
Princeton and Oxford, 2004, p.104.
[9] Maria Green Cowles and James A. Caporaso and Thomas Risse, “Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction,” in Maria G. Cowles, James Caporaso, and Thomas. Risse (eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001, pp.1-20.
[10] Guy Peters, translated by Wang Xiangmin and Duan Hongwei, Institutional Theory in Political Science: "New Institutionalism", Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2011 edition, p. 69.
[11] Philippe C. Schmitter and Javier Santiso, “Three Temporal Dimensions to the Consolidation of Democracy,” International Political Science Review, Vol.19, No.1,1998, pp.69-92.
[12] Kathleen Thelen, “Historical Institutionalism and Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol.2, 1999, p.19.
[13] Jeffrey T. Checkel, "Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change," International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2001, pp. 553-588.
[14] Maria Green Cowles, James Caporaso and Thomas Risse, Transforming Europe-Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2001, p. 10.
[15] Rendall, S. F. The Practice of Everyday Life.1984.
[16] Zhu Liqun, "A Practical Interpretation Model of China's Participation in the International System," in Diplomatic Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2011, p. 24
[17] Honnett, The Struggle for Recognition, translated by Hu Jihua, Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2005, p. 77
[18] Zhao Yiheng, "After the "Narrative Turn": The Possibility and Necessity of a Broad Narratology," in Jiangxi Social Science, Vol. 9, 2008, p. 36.