Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2022, 4(10); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2022.041008.

Experimental studies on the influence of group identity on economic behavior

Author(s)

Xiaomin Zhang

Corresponding Author:
Xiaomin Zhang
Affiliation(s)

School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China

Abstract

The emergence of identity economics provides a new perspective for the study of individual or group decision-making behavior. In recent years, the experimental research on group identity provides abundant evidence for identity economics. This paper reviews literature on identity and sorts out the experimental studies on the influence of group identity on economic behavior. Finally, this paper draws a conclusion on the related research in this field and puts forward the future prospects.

Keywords

Group identity, identity economics, Experimental economics, Behavioral economics, Neuroeconomics

Cite This Paper

Xiaomin Zhang. Experimental studies on the influence of group identity on economic behavior. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 10: 43-46. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2022.041008.

References

[1] Tajfel H, Turner J C, Austin W G et al. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict [J]. Organizational identity: A reader, 1979(1): 56-65.

[2] Tajfel H, Billig M G, Bundy R P et al. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour [J]. European journal of social psychology, 1971, 1(2): 149-178.

[3] Zhou Y, Wang Y. Social identity, preference and economic behavior: Based on the reviews of the research findings of behavior and experimental economics [J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2016(10): 95-105.

[4] Benjamin D J, Choi J J, Fisher G. Religious identity and economic behavior [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2016, 98(4): 617-637.

[5] Grosskopf B, Pearce G. Do you mind me paying less? Measuring other-regarding preferences in the market for taxis [R]. The Field Experiments Website, 2016.

[6] Eckel C C, Grossman P J. Managing diversity by creating team identity [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2005, 58(3): 371-392.

[7] Chen Y, Li S X. Group identity and social preferences [J]. American Economic Review, 2009, 99(1): 431-457.

[8] Li S X, Dogan K, Haruvy E. Group identity in markets [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2011, 29(1): 104-115.

[9] Pan X S, Houser D. Cooperation during cultural group formation promotes trust towards members of out-groups [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 280: 1-6.

[10] Camera G, Hohl L. Group-identity and long-run cooperation: an experiment [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2021,188: 903-915.

[11] Drouvelis M, Nosenzo D. Group identity and leading-by-example [J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2013, 39(12): 414-425.

[12] Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Jiménez N. Identities, selection, and contributions in a public-goods game[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2014, 87: 322-338.

[13] Bernhard H, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. Parochial altruism in humans [J]. Nature, 2006, 442(7105): 912-915.

[14] Butler J V, Conzo P, Leroch M. Social identity and punishment [J]. Unpublished working paper, 2013.

[15] Kranton R, Pease M, Sanders S et al. Identity, group conflict, and social preferences [J]. Working paper, 2012.

[16] Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S. The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups [J]. American Economic Review, 2006, 96(2): 212-216.

[17] Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A. Individual behavior and group membership [J]. American Economic Review, 2007, 97(4): 1340-1352.

[18] Montalan B, Boitout A, Veujoz M et al. Social identity-based motivation modulates attention bias toward negative information: an event-related brain potential study [J]. Socioaffective neuroscience & psychology, 2011, 1(1): 5892.

[19] Wang Y, Tang Y Y, Deng Y. The impacts of racial group membership on people’s distributive justice: an event-related potential study [J]. NeuroReport, 2014, 25(6): 373-378.

[20] Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang W et al. Group membership modulates the recipient’s fairness consideration in ultimatum game [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1850-1859.

[21] Wang Y, Zhang Z, Bai L et al. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations[J]. Scientific reports, 2017, 7(1): 1-10.

[22] Morese R, Rabellino D, Sambataro F et al. Group membership modulates the neural circuitry underlying third party punishment [J]. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(11): 1-14.

[23] Yang J, Zhang H, Ni J et al. Within-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict [J]. Nature neuroscience, 2020, 23(6): 754-760.