Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(9); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.040907.

Research on Environmental Law Theory from the View of Sociology of Law

Author(s)

Tian Haiqiang1, Fan Zhipeng2

Corresponding Author:
Tian Haiqiang
Affiliation(s)

1School of Sociology, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650031, China

2School of Law, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650031, China

Abstract

The development model of environmental law research paradigm does not follow the trajectory of traditional law theory, but gradually matures with the socialization, globalization, international, comprehensive and highly scientific development of environmental problems.Based on the new theoretical paradigm of environmental law, this paper makes a preliminary exploration and construction in the modernization and transformation of environmental governance, so as to reconstruct the basic content and legal framework of environmental law theory paradigm.In general, the environmental law research should continuously deepen its theoretical connotation in the social law paradigm.In short, the research methodology of environmental law is returned to the field of pedagogy, in order to strengthen the social practice effect of the localization research of environmental law in China, and focus on guiding the solution of the environmental protection problems faced in the practice of environmental law.

Keywords

environmental sociology; environmental law theory; social law paradigm; localization study

Cite This Paper

Tian Haiqiang, Fan Zhipeng. Research on Environmental Law Theory from the View of Sociology of Law. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 9: 41-47. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.040907.

References

[1] Chen Quansheng et al. Environmental Law philosophy [M]. Beijing: China Legal Affairs Press, 2012:539-571.

[2] Yu Jun. On the Impact of Environmental Problems on Law Science- -and Discussion with Professor Cai Shouqiu [J].Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Science edition), 2011 (04): 51-52.

[3] Deng Zhenglai: Where is Chinese Law going [M].Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2006:38-43.

[4] Cai Shouqiu: Adjustment theory- -Reflection and supplement to mainstream jurisprudence [M].Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003:179,233,242.

[5] Lv Zhongmei: Environmental resource Law Theory Cluster (Vol. 12) [C].Beijing: Law Press, 2020:3.

[6] Chang Jiwen: Frontier of Environmental Law- -Historical Combing and Development Exploration [M].Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2011:284.

[7] Lei Lei: The basic position of law pedagogy [J].Chinese and foreign Law, 2015 (1): 211-216.

[8] Du Hui: Chen Demin. Philosophical speculation of Environmental Law paradigm Change- -from epistemology to practice [J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Science edition), 2012 (01): 117-121.

[9] Lv Zhongmei: New Vision of Environmental Law [M].Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 20193rd: 39-45.

[10] Li Zhongxia: Law of functional orientation: tradition and reflection [J].Global Law Review, 2020 (05): 15-16.

[11] Li Saian: The historical evolution and logical expansion of legal pedagogy concepts [D].Zhejiang University, 2016:16-20.

[12] Lei Lei: Law teaching and rule of Law: the governance significance of law teaching [J].Law Research, 2018 (05): 65-69.

[13] Sun Haibo: Methodological reflection of the dispute between Law, teaching and Social Science and Law- -Focusing on the interaction between law and justice [J].Oriental Law, 2015 (04): 74-77.

[14] Ding Jiayu: On Comprehensive Law- -Taking Bodenheimer- -Jurisprudence, Philosophy and Methods of Law, as the sample [D], Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2009:16-20.

[15] Carl Larenz: Legal methodology [M].Huangjia Town, translation. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2020:289-290.