Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2022, 5(10); doi: 10.25236/AJCIS.2022.051001.

Analysis and Governance Proposal of Algorithmic Power Alienation

Author(s)

Le Wang, Jun Qian

Corresponding Author:
Le Wang
Affiliation(s)

Fadedongheng Law Firm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Abstract

The development of Internet technology has allowed algorithms to gradually deepen their influence on our lives, and have been alienated into the power that can mobilize various factors of production, and targeted governance is imperative. This paper starts from the necessity of power alienation, analyzes the key factors, draws on mature experience, and puts forward feasible suggestions for the current situation.

Keywords

Algorithm, Algorithmic power, Algorithmic governance

Cite This Paper

Le Wang, Jun Qian. Analysis and Governance Proposal of Algorithmic Power Alienation. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science (2022), Vol. 5, Issue 10: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJCIS.2022.051001.

References

[1] B.H. Raven: Power and Social Influence, Ivan Dale Steiner& Martin Fishbein(eds.), Current Studies in Social Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968, pp.127—145

[2] [US] Christopher Steiner, "Algorithmic Empire", translated by Li Shiaoying, People's Post and Telecommunications Publishing House, 2014, p. 132.

[3] Peng, Lan. Survival, cognition, and relationships: how algorithms will change us[J]. Journalism, 2021(03): 45-53.

[4] Sandra Barman, Change of State: Information, Policy, and Power, The MIT Press, 2006, p.11—12.

[5] Article 6.1 of the Taobao Platform Service Agreement (effective date 08/19/2019). https://terms. alicdn.com/legal-agreement/terms/TD/TD201609301342_19559.html, 2021-09-11.

[6] Zheng Yushuang. Cracking the technology neutrality conundrum-Jurisprudence of the relationship between law and technology rethought[J]. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2018, 21(01): 85-97.

[7] Empowering big data to build a smart transportation ecosystem, http://www.rmjtxw.com/news/ dsj/40968.html, 2021-09-11.

[8] [US] Luke Dormer, The Age of Algorithms: New Engines for the New Economy, translated by Hu Xiaorui and Zhong Yi, CITIC Publishing Group, 2016, p. 56.

[9] Tan Jiusheng, Fan Xiaoyun. The causes, risks and governance of algorithmic "black boxes" [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2020, 23(06): 92-99.

[10] Zhang Shuling, Cracking the black box: Algorithmic power regulation and transparent realization mechanism in the era of smart media [J]. China Publishing, 2018(07): 49-53.

[11] In Wisconsin v. Eric Loomis, the sentencing phase court adopted the COMPAS recidivism evaluation, prompting Loomis to appeal on the grounds that the court's reliance on COMPAS violated his due process rights and his right to equality. The state Supreme Court ultimately upheld the initial sentence. 2020.

[12] Jeff Larson, eta, How We Analyzed the COMPAS recidivism Algorithm. https://www.propublica.org /article/how we analyzed the compas recidivism algorithm. 2021-09-11

[13] Zhang Linghan, The conflict and reconciliation between algorithmic automated decision-making and administrative due process system [J]. Eastern Jurisprudence, 2020(06): 4-17.

[14] Ning Yuan, The adherence and amendment of the rule of informed consent in personal information protection [J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2020(02): 115-127.

[15] Zhang Linghan: A study of algorithmic interpretation power of business automated decision making [J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwestern University of Political Science and Law), 2018, 36(03): 65-74.

[16] Wang Qinghua, The path of legal regulation of artificial intelligence: A framework discussion [J]. Modern Jurisprudence, 2019, 41(02): 54-63.

[17] [US] Nicholas Negroponte, Digital Survival, translated by Hu Yong and Fan Haiyan, Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2017, p. 299.