Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2022, 4(11); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2022.041103.
Yixuan Liao
Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 071000, China
In 2006, the Ministry of Finance of China issued the CAS3 accounting standard, introducing the fair value measurement model into the measurement of real estate investment. However, by the end of 2021, A-share listed companies that changed their cost measurement model of real estate investment to the measurement model of fair value accounted for a very small proportion of all A-share listed companies holding real estate investment in China. This paper selects China Fortune Land Development Co., Ltd. (CFLD), a representative company, as the case object, and studies its motivation of changing the measurement model of real estate investment in 2018 from three aspects: earnings management, profits of major shareholders, and compensation management of senior managers, and analysis of economic consequences from both short-term and long-term perspectives. It is expected to provide references for stakeholders to correctly interpret the disclosed fair value information of real estate companies and for relevant listed companies to reasonably adopt the fair value measurement model.
Real estate investment, the fair value measurement model, motivation change, economic consequences, China Fortune Land Development Co., Ltd (CFLD)
Yixuan Liao. Motivation Change of CFLD's Real Estate Investment Measurement Model and Analysis of the Economic Consequences. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 11: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2022.041103.
[1] Shen Xiaoping. Discussion on accounting treatment of investment real estate. [J]. Accounting Research, 2006(01): 41-42.
[2] Wang Hai. Research on the economic consequences of Overseas M&A of Chinese enterprises - Based on the case analysis of Lenovo's acquisition of IBM PC business. [J]. Management World, 2007(02): 94-106+119+172.
[3] Dechow, Patricia M., Myers, Linda A., Shakespeare, Catherine. Fair value accounting and gains from asset securitizations: A convenient earnings management tool with compensation side-benefits. [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2010, Vol. 49(No.1-2): 2-25.
[4] Thomas N, Henning Z. The Reliability of Investment Property Fir Values Under IFRS. [J]. Journal of Property Investment&Finance, 2014, 8: 16-18.
[5] Doron Israeli. Recognition versus disclosure: evidence from fair value of investment property. [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2015, 20(4).
[6] Liu Xiaojie. Comparison of economic consequences of different measurement models of investment real estate. [J]. Communication of Finance and Accounting, 2015(13): 79-80.
[7] Yue Shangzhi, Xiao Siwen. The correlation between social responsibility and fair value measurement. [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2016, 0117-19.
[8] Bi Fengyu, Zhang Xianmei. Value correlation analysis of fair value level information. [J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2018, 01: 21-27.
[9] Wang Ye, Sun Huiqian, Wang Ningning. Stock option incentive, debt contract and investment real estate measurement model selection. [J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2018(12): 74-83.
[10] Kong Lingming. Analysis on the economic consequences of executive selling of listed companies based on event research method. [J]. Communication of Finance and Accounting, 2018(23): 25-29.
[11] Liu Dongfang, Chen Huiying. International comparison and reference of accounting treatment of investment real estate. [J]. Communication of Finance and Accounting, 2019(28): 115-119.
[12] Ma Jian, Li Lianjun. Research on the economic consequences of enterprise financial sharing mode. [J]. Modern Economic Research, 2020(02): 50-57.
[13] Zhang Qishan, Chen Jian. The impact of real estate investment on the business cycle. [J]. Social Science Front, 2021(09): 61-68.