Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Sport Research, 2022, 4(6); doi: 10.25236/FSR.2022.040602.

Sport Facility Asset Transfer and the Creativity of Volunteer-Run Public Facilities


Chengze Liu, Jipeng Wang, Xue Wu

Corresponding Author:
Chengze Liu

Moray College School of Education and Sport, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK


Influenced by the world economic environment, many sports facilities expenditure after the Games will bring a heavy economic burden to the government. It is very important to deliver sports facilities to the community and the local governmentThis article aims to use literature analysis to critically analyse the argument that the asset transferral of the local government sport facilities to volunteers could transform sport services by stimulating creativity in local communities. It mainly uses the concept of social innovation and the Big Society to recognise the challenges and benefits during and after the sport facility transfer.


sport facility, creative, transfer, volunteer

Cite This Paper

Chengze Liu, Jipeng Wang, Xue Wu. Sport Facility Asset Transfer and the Creativity of Volunteer-Run Public Facilities. Frontiers in Sport Research (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 6: 6-11. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSR.2022.040602.


[1] Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. New York: Greenwood Press.

[2] Chadha, J. 2016. The UK economy in the long expansion and its aftermath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[3] Conservative Party. 2010. Building a Big Society. [Online]. [Accessed 7 April 2018]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78979/building-big-society_0.pdf

[4] Crisp, R. 2015. Work clubs and the Big Society: Reflections on the potential for ‘progressive localism’ in the ‘cracks and fissures’ of neoliberalism. People, Place and Society, 9(1), pp.1-16. 

[5] Enjolras, B. 2002. The commercialisation of voluntary sports organisations in Norway. Non-profit and voluntary sector quarterly, 31 (3), pp.353–376.

[6] Forkert, K. 2016. Austere creativity and volunteer-run public services: the case of Lewisham's libraries. New Formations, 87, pp.11-28.

[7] GOV.UK. 2018. Charitable Rate Relief. [Online]. [Accessed 7 April 2018]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/apply-for-business-rate-relief/charitable-rate-relief

[8] Groom, R., Taylor, W. & Nelson, L. 2014. Volunteering Insight: Report for Sport England March 2014. [Online]. [Accessed 7 April 2018]. Available from: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/893/2/volunteering-insight-project-for-sport-england.pdf

[9] Harris, S., Mori, K. & Collins, M. 2009. Great Expectations: Voluntary Sports Clubs and Their Role in Delivering National Policy for English Sport.  International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(4), pp.405–423.

[10] Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Besemer, K., & Bramley, G. 2015. Coping with the cuts? The Management of the worst financial settlement in living memory. Local Government Studies, 41(4), pp.601–621.

[11] Institute for Fiscal Studies. 2015. This government has delivered substantial spending cuts; big differences in parties’ plans for next parliament. [Online]. [Accessed 7 April 2018]. Available from:  http://election2015.ifs.org.uk/public-spending

[12] King, N. 2014. Local authority sport services under the UK coalition government: Retention, revision or curtailment? International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(1), pp.349-369.

[13] Kisby, B. 2010. The Big Society: Power to the People? Political Quarterly, 81(4), pp.484–491.

[14] Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. 2012. Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), pp.21-40.

[15] Nichols, G., Forbes, D., Findlay-King, L. & Macfadyen, G. 2018. Localism and the Big Society: the asset transfer of leisure centres and libraries – fighting closures or empowering communities? Leisure Studies, 37(2), pp.158–170.

[16] Nichols, G. 2016. How much is enough? The love of money, and the case for the good life. Leisure Studies, 35(4), pp.505–506.

[17] Nichols, G., Forbes, D., Findlay-King, L. & Macfadyen, G. 2015. Is the Asset Transfer of Public Leisure Facilities in England an Example of Associative Democracy? Administrative Sciences, 5(2), pp.71-87.

[18] Nichols, G., & Forbes, D. 2014. The transfer of public leisure facilities to volunteer delivery. [Online]. [Accessed 7 April 2018]. Available from: http://svrn.group.shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Nichols-and-Forbes-transfer-of-leisure-facilities-to-volunteer-delivery 20141. pdf

[19] Nichols, G., Taylor, P., Barrett, D. & Jeans, R. 2014. Youth sport volunteers in England: A paradox between reducing the state and promoting a Big Society. Sport Management Review,17(3), pp.337-346.

[20] Nicholson, M. & Hoye, R. 2008. Sport and social capital. London: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.

[21] Morgan, H. 2013. Sport volunteering, active citizenship and social capital enhancement: what role in the ‘Big Society’? International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(3), pp.381–395.

[22] Murtagh, B. 2015. Community asset transfer in Northern Ireland. Policy and politics, 43(2), pp.221–237.

[23] Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

[24] Reid, F. 2012. Increasing sports participation in Scotland: are voluntary sports clubs the answer? International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(2), pp.221–241.

[25] Sieppel, O. 2008. Sports in civil society: networks, social capital and influence. European Sociological Review, 24 (1), pp.69–80.

[26] Such, L. 2013. Little leisure in the Big Society. Leisure Studies, 32(1), pp.89-107.

[27] Williams, A., Goodwin, M. & Cloke, P. 2014. Neoliberalism, Big Society, and progressive localism. Environment and Planning, 46(12), pp.2798-2815.