Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(10); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.041004.

The Dimension of False Litigation Identification under the Scope of the Civil Code

Author(s)

Zhang Yang, Luan Dongqi, Xuan Ang 

Corresponding Author:
Zhang Yang
Affiliation(s)

Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116300, China

Abstract

With the continuous progress of the implementation of the civil Code, the identification and treatment of false litigation cases tend to be standardized and exemplary. By comparing the key areas with a high incidence of false litigation, such as private lending disputes, labor contract disputes and sales contract disputes, the comparison of whether they conform to the behaviors regulated by the civil code is identified. At the same time to the civil code scope of the false litigation identification should be the pattern and real performance analysis, put forward the construction of the civil code key areas of false litigation case think-tank, increase the binary control mechanism guarantee advance recognition, and perfect the case of outsiders again program against improvement Suggestions, for under the civil code scope of false litigation identification opinions, to speed up the construction of false lawsuit litigation cases and the development of the civil code has a positive role.

Keywords

Civil Code; False Litigation; Private Lending Dispute; Prior Identification

Cite This Paper

Zhang Yang, Luan Dongqi, Xuan Ang. The Dimension of False Litigation Identification under the Scope of the Civil Code. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 10: 18-21. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.041004.

References

[1] Zhang Mingkai. Fundamental Issues of the crime of false litigation [J]. Law, 2017 (1).

[2] Wu Zeyong. The Regulation of False Litigation under the Legal Background of the Civil Procedure Law [J]. Jiaotong University Law, 2017 (2).

[3] Zhang Weiping, Ren Zhong Zhong. Research on the procedural rights protection system of the third party outside the case [J]. Legal Science, 2014 (6).

[4] Qiu Birong.—— takes 220 judgements as a sample [J]. Southeast Judicial Review, 2017 (10).

[5] Weng Xiaobin. Power exploration doctrine turns to debate doctrine thinking [J]. Legal Studies, 2005 (4).

[6] Gege.——'s Analysis and Research based on an Empirical Perspective [J]. Jiaotong University Law, 2017.

[7] Pan Jianfeng, Han Jingru. The nature orientation and relationship inquiry of the third party's revocation appeal are explored [J]. Shandong Social Sciences, 2015 (7).

[8] Wang Qian. Strengthen node monitoring to accurately fight against false litigation [N]. People's Court Daily, 2016-07-04