The rapidly developing Web 2.0 technologies positively affect the development of User-generated Content (UGC). UGC is considered as various types of multimedia content generated by online users that are available publicly. The situations of UGC are not optimistic in the UK, as the current copyright protection for original works is deemed to be over strict, which leads to a series of problems such as an inhibition of freedom of users and hindrance to economic growth and innovation. In order to explore how to effectively introduce the new exception into the copyright law of the UK, this paper refers to the copyright protection approaches of the copyright laws of Canada and the US for UGC. With respect to the Canadian experience, Canadian copyright law adopts a semi-open dealing system, whereas US copyright law establishes a fair use system to protect UGC. Both methods have achieved some degree of success in practice. However, each of them has its drawbacks. The introduction of semi-open fair trade system into the UK copyright system will improve the flexibility and efficiency copyright protection of UGC. But it has also been criticized for imposing too much emphasis on non-commercial purposes and for overlapping protection issues. The core advantage of the US fair use system is that it is flexible to balance exclusive rights with satisfying social, cultural and economic needs, but one of the realistic problems is that the UK does not have a tradition of fair use system and whether it can be implemented in the UK copyright law remains to be seen. After a comparison between the US approach and Canadian approach to the copyright protection of UGC, it can be concluded that a semi-open fair dealing regime for a UGC exception in UK copyright law with reference to Canadian experience is much more suitable for the UK, which will provide more flexibility and legal certainty.

Changshan Ma. Introduction of a New Exception: The Protection of User-Generated Content under UK Copyright Law. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 10: 53-58. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.041010.

[1] George C E, Scerri J. Web 2.0 and user-generated content: Legal challenges in the new frontier[J]. Journal of Information, Law and Technology, 2007, 2: 1-22.

[2] European Commission. Copyright in the knowledge economy[M]. Commission of the European Communities, 2008.

[3] Sarikakis K, Krug C, Rodriguez-Amat J R. Defining authorship in user-generated content: Copyright struggles in The Game of Thrones[J]. New Media & Society, 2017, 19(4): 542-559.

[4] Osborne D. User generated content (UGC): Trade mark and copyright infringement issues[J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2008, 3(9): 555-562.

[5] Gervais D. The tangled web of UGC: Making copyright sense of user-generated content[J]. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 2008, 11: 841-870.

[6] Valcke P, Lenaerts M. Who's author, editor and publisher in user-generated content? Applying traditional media concepts to UGC providers[J]. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2010, 24(1): 119-131.

[7] Helberger N, Guibault L, Janssen E H, et al. Legal aspects of user created content[J/OL]. (2009-11-03)[2022-09-17] http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1499333.

[8] Dnes A W. Should the UK move to a fair-use copyright exception[J]. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44(4): 418-444.

[9] Intellectual Property Office. Exceptions to copyright[EB/OL]. (2021-01-04)[2022-09-17] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright.

[10] Cabay J, Lambrecht M. Remix prohibited: How rigid EU copyright laws inhibit creativity[J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, 10(5): 359-377.

[11] Hargreaves I. Digital opportunity: A review of intellectual property and growth[M]. UK Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, 2011.

[12] CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC 13[R/OL]. (2004-03-04)[2022-09-17] https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2004/2004scc13/2004scc13.html.

[13] Tawfik M J. The supreme court of Canada and the fair dealing trilogy: Elaborating A doctrine of user rights under Canadian copyright Law[J]. Alberta Law Review, 2013, 51: 191-200.

[14] Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Bell Canada, 2012 SCC 36 (CanLII), [2012] 2 SCR 326[R/OL]. (2012-07-12)[2022-09-17] https://canlii.ca/t/fs0vf.

[15] Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright), 2012 SCC 37 (CanLII), [2012] 2 SCR 345[R/OL]. (2012-07-12)[2022-09-17] https://canlii.ca/t/fs0v5.

[16] Awan M. The user generated content exception: Moving away from a non-commercial requirement[J]. Canadian Intellectual Property Review, 2016, 32: 27-42.

[17] Lambrecht M, Cabay J. Remix allowed: avenues for copyright reform inspired by Canada[J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, 11(1): 21-36.

[18] Scassa T. Acknowledging Copyright’s Illegitimate Offspring: User-Generated content and Canadian copyright law[M]//Geist M. The Copyright pentalogy : How the supreme court of Canada shook the foundations of Canadian copyright law. Ottawa, CA: University of Ottawa Press, 2013: 437.

[19] 17 U. S. C s 107[S]. Washington, US: United States Government Publications Office, 2006.

[20] Senftleben M. Bridging the differences between copyright's legal traditions-the emerging EC fair use doctrine[J]. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A., 2009, 57(3): 521-552.

[21] Burks M A. Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 104 S. Ct. 774 (1984): Is copyright law in need of congressional action[J]. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 1985, 12: 157.

[22] Acuff-Rose Music Inc v Campbell [1992] 6th Cir [1992] 972 F.2d 1429[R/OL]. (1992-08-17)[2022-09-17] https://casetext.com/case/acuff-rose-music-inc-v-campbell.

[23] Woo J. Redefining the Transformative use of copyrighted works: toward a fair use standard in the digital environment[J]. Hastings Comm. & Ent. LJ, 2004, 27(1): 51-78.

[24] Von Lohmann F. Fair use, film, and the advantages of Internet distribution[J]. Cinema Journal, 2007, 46(2): 128-133.