Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2022, 4(12); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2022.041214.

Institutional Environment, Institutional Distance and Chinese OFDI - A Literature Review

Author(s)

Xueqing Zhu

Corresponding Author:
Xueqing Zhu
Affiliation(s)

Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, 200000, China

Abstract

This paper sorts out the relationship between absolute institutional factors and bilateral institutional distance and the location choice of Chinese OFDI, including the methods of measuring absolute institutional quality and institutional distance, and the impact of institutional quality or institutional distance on the location choice of Chinese OFDI. Currently, there is no unified standard for measuring institutional quality and calculating institutional distance, but scholars mainly use the World Governance Indicators (WGI) to measure institutional quality and bilateral institutional distance. Regarding institutional quality, there is no uniformity in the impact of the bilateral institutional environment on China's OFDI, and there are even opposing views. There are institutional risk aversion and institutional risk preferences regarding institutional quality, and institutional escape and institutional proximity theories regarding institutional distance. As research progresses, more and more scholars are also aware of the need for heterogeneity analysis of countries, regional industries, etc.

Keywords

institutional quality; institutional distance; Chinese OFDI

Cite This Paper

Xueqing Zhu. Institutional Environment, Institutional Distance and Chinese OFDI - A Literature Review. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 12: 78-83. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2022.041214.

References

[1] Yang, Jiaohui, Wang, Wei & Tan, Na. (2016). Solving the mystery of "institutional risk preference" in the locational distribution of Chinese OFDI [J]. World Economy (11), 3-27.

[2] Qiu, L. C. & Yang, D. B. (2015). Location choice of Chinese firms' OFDI - A comparative analysis of state-owned and private firms  [J]. International Trade Issues (06), 139-147. 

[3] Wen, Yu-Yuan & Yang, Yuxian. (2021). Investment motives, institutional quality, and location choice of Chinese outward FDI  [J]. The Economist (01), 81-90. 

[4] Tian Bifei & Deng Caixia. (2021). Whether prior trade can regulate the impact of institutional distance on Chinese outward FDI: A spatial econometric analysis based on countries along the Belt and Road [J]. International Business (Journal of the University of International Business and Economics) (01), 48-64. 

[5] Jiang Guanhong & Jiang Dianchun. (2012). Chinese investment in developing countries - do host country institutions matter [J]. Management World (11), 45-56. 

[6] Deng M. (2012). Institutional distance", demonstration effect" and the locational distribution of OFDI in China  [J]. International Trade Issues (02), 123-135. 

[7] Li Junjiu, Qiu Jianyu & He Bin. (2020). Cultural distance, institutional distance, and OFDI: An empirical study of China's OFDI in countries along the Belt and Road [J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) (01), 120-134.