With the advantages of "vehicle-electricity separation", effectively shortening the replenishment time, relieving users' mileage anxiety, and facilitating the perfection of power battery recycling system, new energy vehicle battery swap has become an important research direction to respond to the government's "low carbon" policy and promote the development of new energy vehicle industry. In this paper, we analyze the differences in the supply chain structure of the three battery swap models led by car manufacturers, battery manufacturers and battery swap operators, and build models of battery swap operation under three different power structures based on the actual market situation. Using the combination of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE), we use the questionnaires and expert evaluation methods to evaluate and analyze the input and output of the battery swap enterprises, supply chain risk resilience and competitiveness of new energy vehicles under the three different supply chain structures. We compare and conclude that the battery swap model dominated by battery enterprises is generally better than the other two battery swap operation models, then we analyze and conclude the advantages of different operation modes in order to draw some management insights.

Ye Qianbi, Qian Kewei. Evaluation and Selection of Battery Swap Operation Mode of New Energy Vehicles. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 12: 91-103. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2022.041216.

[1] Chinese State Council. Guidance of The State Council on Accelerating the Establishment and Improvement of a Green and low-carbon Circular Development Economic System [R]. Beijing, 2021

[2] Kaymak Öznur Öztunç, Kaymak Yiğit. Prediction of crude oil prices in COVID-19 outbreak using real data[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2022, : 111990-.

[3] Prospective Industry Research Institute. Market Foresight and Investment Strategy Planning Analysis Report of China's New Energy Automobile Industry[EB]. Prospective Industry Research Institute, 2022

[4] Dai Jiachang. Comparison between the whole vehicle Charging Mode and Centralized Charging + switching Mode of electric Vehicle [J]. Power Demand Side Management, 2014, 16(1): 57-60. 

[5] Zaher G K, Shaaban M F, Mokhtar M, et al. Optimal operation of battery exchange stations for electric vehicles[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2021, 192(1): 106935.

[6] Liang Y N, Zhang X P. Battery swap pricing and charging strategy for electric taxis in China[J]. Energy, 2018, 15(147): 561-577.

[7] Su yu, He Xuwei. Tangshan risk analysis and management of electric vehicle industry [J]. Journal of horizon of science and technology, 2013 (4) : 149-150. The DOI: 10.19694 / j.carol carroll nki issn2095-2457.2013.04.109.

[8] Dun Yaolong, Wang Jun, Guo Yiqiang, Zhang Yanan. Da 'an land consolidation based on AHP and FCE model sustainability evaluation [J]. Journal of China land science, 2014, 28 (08) : 57-64. DOI: 10.13708 / j.carol carroll nki cn11-2640.2014.08.008.

[9] Liu Chang, Xia Lu, Hu Jinyong, et al. Research on Evaluation System of Network Service Capability of electric Vehicle Charging Service [J]. Application of Electronic Technology, 2014(Z1):146-149. 

[10] Zhang Caiqing, Yang Ruipeng, Xu Lingli. Study on economic evaluation of electric vehicle charging and changing station [J]. Electric power & energy, 2019, 40(06):751-755.