International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(10); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.041019.
Qing Xia
School of Economics and Management, Communication University of China, Beijing, 100024, China
Based on the content analysis of the multilingual articles of selected Wikipedia entries, this study examines the Wiki-content editing processes from the aspects of topic, framing, discourse, reference preferences and the relevance among languages, questioning with evidence that Wiki’s editing processes do not implement its editorial principles of objectivity and neutrality: Western discourse frameworks have taken root in the civilian global digital community; and there exists a biased “consensus” multilingually though the consistency of Wikipedia entries in various languages is currently weak and relatively independent. The intensified trend of linguistic hegemony highlights the necessity of better utilization of the Wiki-like worldwide platforms, and the importance of China to plan up-to-date international communication strategy and execution path with wisdom.
Wikipedia; Linguistic Hegemony; Discourse Framework; National Image; International Communication Strategy
Qing Xia. Wikipedia Entries: Collaborative Editing of Bias under Linguistic Hegemony?. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 10: 109-114. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.041019.
[1] Silver L, Devlin K, Huang C. (2020) Unfavorable Views of China Reach Historic Highs in Many Countries. Pew Research Center, 6.
[2] Boulding K E. (1959) National Images and International Systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(2), 120-131.
[3] Zhi Y, Bao D, Luo C. (2017) Economic Value of Country Image: Evidence from International Trade and Implications for China. China & World Economy, 25(3), 87-111.
[4] Shambaugh D L. (2013) China Goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 16-18.
[5] Lih A. (2004) Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for Evaluating Collaborative Media as a News Resource. Nature, 3(1), 1-31.
[6] Hannah Greving, Ulrike Cress, Joachim Kimmerle. (2019) Anger in Wikipedia: Perceived Intentionality and Threat Appraisal as Mediators of Anger about Man-make Attacks. Journal of applied social psychology, 49(2), 99-116.
[7] Guo L. (2015) A Theoretical Explication of the Network Agenda Setting Model. The Power of Information Networks: New Directions for Agenda Setting, 1.
[8] Entman R M, Matthes J, Pellicano L. (2009) Nature, Sources, and Effects of News Framing. The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 175-190.
[9] Bryant S L, Forte A, Bruckman A. (2005) Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 1-10.
[10] Rainer R, Gisela G. (2019) Wikipedia as a Space for Discursive Constructions of Globalization. International Communication Gazette, 81(1), 3-19.
[11] Maier S R. (2020) The World View(ed) through the English-speaking Media Lens: Foreign News Coverage Steadfastly Narrow and Uniform. The Journal of International Communication, 26(2), 155-170.