Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2022, 4(9); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2022.040914.

Roles of Self-Construal in Workplace Dynamics

Author(s)

Amelia Zhao

Corresponding Author:
Amelia Zhao
Affiliation(s)

McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Abstract

People with independent self-construal value individuality and self-realization [8]. The author expected these individuals to show an increased tendency to report ethical issues at work and a lower extent of mental impact from workplace gossip. In the studies, 22 current McGill University students were surveyed, and the results revealed a weak positive correlation between independent self-construal level and ethical-issue reporting behaviours, as well as a stronger negative correlation between independent self-construal level and the psychological impact of workplace gossip. The findings suggest that independent self-construal plays a less significant role in workplace dynamics than anticipated among current university students and provide managerial implications.

Keywords

Self-Construal, Ethical Issue Reporting, Workplace Gossip, Affective Commitment, Psychological Impact

Cite This Paper

Amelia Zhao. Roles of Self-Construal in Workplace Dynamics. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 9: 64-71. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2022.040914.

References

[1] Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999. 2202131 

[2] Axelrod R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80, 1095–1111. doi:10.2307/1960858

[3] Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323

[4] Cui, Z. (2020). The relationship between negative workplace gossip and organizational citizenship behavior: An explanation from social exchange theory.

[5] Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of general psychology, 8(2), 78-99.

[6] Foels, R., & Tomcho, T. J. (2009). Gender differences in interdependent self-construals: It’s not the type

of group, it’s the way you see it. Self and Identity, 8(4), 396-417.

[7] Grant, R. M., & Visconti, M. (2006). The strategic background to corporate accounting scandals. Long Range Planning, 39, 361-83.

[8] Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human communication research, 22(4), 510-543.

[9] Guo, G., Cheng, B., Tian, J., Ma, J., & Gong, C. (2022). Effects of negative workplace gossip on unethical work behavior in the hospitality industry: the roles of moral disengagement and self-construal. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(3), 290-310.

[10] Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

[11] Holmvall, C. M., & Bobocel, D. R. (2008). What fair procedures say about me: Self-construals and reactions to procedural fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(2), 147–168. 

[12] Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. (2006). When organizational justice and the self- concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 175–201. 

[13] Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of management, 34(5), 978-1008.

[14] Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behaviour by unravelling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64(6), 843-869.

[15] Kim, M. S., W. F. Sharkey, and T. M. Singelis. 1994. “The Relationship Between Individual’s Self- Construals and Perceived Importance of Interactive Constraints.” International Journal of Intercultural Relation 18: 117–40. 

[16] Kirchmayer, Z., & Fratričová, J. (2020). What motivates generation Z at work? Insights into motivation drivers of business students in Slovakia. Proceedings of the Innovation management and education excellence through vision, 6019-6030.

[17] Kniffin, K. M., & Sloan Wilson, D. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: Why and how gossip can serve groups. Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 150-176.

[18] Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428–438. 

[19] Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 95–107. 

[20] Liu, Y. (2011). Self-Construal: Review and Prospect. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(3), 427-439.  

[21] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion and motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 224–253. 

[22] McCrindle, M. (2014), The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the Global Generations, 3rd ed., McCrindle Research, Bella Vista. 

[23] McCrindle, M., & Wolfinger, E. (2009). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations. The ABC of XYZ.

[24] Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 78(1), 61-89. 

[25] Muller, D. (2020, February 3). The 5 Most Common Types of Workplace Harassment. Solutions for Employee Relations and HR Case Management. Retrieved from https://www.hracuity.com/blog/workplace-harassment

[26] Park, C. Y., Park, H. S., Lee, S. Y., & Moon, S. J. (2013). Sexual harassment in Korean college classrooms: how self-construal and gender affect students’ reporting behavior. Gender, Place & Culture, 20(4), 432-450.

[27] Schawbel, D. (2014). Gen Y and Gen Z global workplace expectations study. Millennial Branding news release, September, 12.

[28] Shiv, B., Edell, J. A., & Payne, J. W. (1997). Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 209510 

[29] Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591. 

[30] Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human communication research, 21(3), 354-389.

[31] Taylor, S. G., Bedeian, A. G., & Kluemper, D. H. (2012). Linking workplace incivility to citizenship performance: The combined effects of affective commitment and conscientiousness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 878–893. 

[32] Trevino LK, Weaver GR, Reynolds SJ. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. ˜ Journal of Management, 32, 951–990. doi:10.1177/0149206306294258

[33] Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

[34] Uggen, C., and A. Blackstone. 2004. “Sexual Harassment as a Gendered Expression of Power.” American Sociological Revie, 69 (1): 64–92.

[35] Wu, L-Z., Birtch, T. A., Chiang, F. F. T., & Zhang, H. (2018). Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1873–1898. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632057 

[36] Wu, X., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L-Z., & Ma, J. (2018). The effect of workplace negative gossip on employee proactive behavior in China: The moderating role of traditionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148 (4), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3006-5 

[37] Zhou, X., Fan, L., Cheng, C., & Fan, Y. (2021). When and why do good people not do good deeds? Third-party observers’ unfavorable reactions to negative workplace gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(3), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04470-z