With the rapid economic development and the continuous upgrading of financial innovation, there are many Internet companies in science and technology related to online loans. At the same time, many technology companies have also launched online loan businesses and even created a wide variety of loan products. As a focus of Internet financial enterprises, Ant Financial relies on payment business and scenario development to conduct comprehensive customer insights. It jointly lends with banks and financial institutions, forming a new type of microcredit on the Internet. Internet microcredit has played a positive role in liberalizing interest rates and developing finance. But it still carries various risks, such as credit risk and high leverage risk. The suspension of Ant Financial's listing has deeply affected the hearts of government regulators, the Internet finance industry, and related researchers and may profoundly change China's Internet finance. The Internet finance supervision issues involved are worth pondering. Taking Ant Financial as an example, this article analyzes the problems existing in the supervision of financial technology companies and makes reflections and suggestions.

Chunxi Zhou, Wenyu Zhu. Research on Financial Supervision Issues Related to the Ant Financial Event. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2022) Vol. 4, Issue 15: 70-74. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2022.041512.

[1] Jia Renqiu. Talking about the financial supervision of the Internet in China——Take the "e-zubao-running incident" as an example [J]. China Business Review, 2019(13):68-69.

[2] Kong Fanyao. Thoughts on the Supervision of Fintech Enterprises——Taking Ant Financial as an Example [J]. Shanxi Finance and Taxation, 2020(12):35-38.

[3] Liu Yujie, Xiao Dangui. Penetration monitoring and risk prevention of invisible leverage——Based on the case study of "Ant Financial Services" [J]. Business Economics, 2021(12):187-189.

[4] Cai Jun, Guo Mei. Talking about the business ethics problems in the Ant Financial incident [J]. Modern Business, 2021(15):10-12.

[5] Qi Yongfang, Huang Jiaju. Preventing systemic risks of online micro-loans——Based on the comparison between Ant Financial and the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States [J]. Jilin Financial Research, 2021(07):30-33.

[6] Liu Hanguang. Legalization of Internet Financial Systemic Risk Governance——Taking the "Ant Financial Services" Platform as an Example [J]. Social Science Trends, 2022(01):62-69.

[7] Xia Yu, Guo Fengjun, Wei Mingxia, Fang Lei. Mining of Internet Financial Regulatory Implications Based on the Online Commentary Text of the "Ant Financial Services" Incident [J]. Journal of Management, 2022, 19(01): 119-128.

[8] Zheng Jia, Chen Sijie, Chang Siting, Zhang Changjiang. Risk Identification and Supervision Suggestions on Ant Financial's Online Small Loans [J]. China Collective Economy, 2022(27):88-90.

[9] Metrick Andrew, Tarullo Daniel. Congruent Financial Regulation[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,2022,2021(1).

[10] Eichengreen, Barry. Financial regulation in the age of the platform economy[J]. Journal of Banking Regulation,2021(prepublish).

[11] Groll Thomas,O’Halloran Sharyn,McAllister Geraldine. Delegation and the regulation of U.S. financial markets[J]. European Journal of Political Economy,2021,70.

[12] Jaehwan Jung. The Ontology and Causation of Financial Regulatory Paradigm: The Nonreductive Individualism of Macroprudential Regulation[J]. Journal of International and Area Studies,2020,27(2).

[13] Zhu Yue. Research on Internet Financial Supervision System[C]//.Proceedings of 3rd International Seminar on Education Innovation and Economic Management(SEIEM 2018)(Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research,VOL.286).,2018:211-213.

[14] Shive Sophie A.,Forster Margaret M.. The Revolving Door for Financial Regulators[J]. Review of Finance,2017,21(4).