Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 2022, 4(13); doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2022.041319.

On the System of Right Relief in Criminal Expedited Judgement Procedure

Author(s)

Chennan Shi

Corresponding Author:
Chennan Shi
Affiliation(s)

Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

Abstract

China added the criminal expedited judgment procedure in the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018. The purpose of this system is to improve the efficiency of judicial resource utilization on the premise of ensuring judicial justice. However, its existence not long, there are some problems in the system construction, which makes the actual use of the procedure have a negative impact on the rights of both parties. Therefore, started from the right relief system, this article discussed the right relief system of suspect and defendants in the criminal expedited adjudication procedure on how to achieve the purposes of judicial justice and improving the efficiency of judicial resource utilization while ensuring that suspect and defendants can get relief legally.

Keywords

Criminal expedited judgment procedure; Right relief system; Repentance and withdrawal of confession; Right of appeal; Criminal record sealing system

Cite This Paper

Chennan Shi. On the System of Right Relief in Criminal Expedited Judgement Procedure. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2022), Vol. 4, Issue 13: 126-131. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2022.041319.

References

[1] Lingyong Kong. Reflection and Reconstruction of the Relief Mechanism of Criminal Prompt Judgment Procedure [J]. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 43 (02): 110-118. DOI: 10.13796/j.cnki.1001-5019.2019.02.013.

[2] Chongyi Fan, Dongqing He. The quick judgment procedure under the transformation of the criminal procedure model [J]. Journal of the National Public Prosecutor's College, 2020, 28 (03): 3-15.

[3] Zhigang Yu. Reflections on Building a Criminal Record Termination Query System [J]. Jurist, 2011 (05): 54-63+176-177. DOI: 10.16094/j.cnki.1005-0221.2011.05-08.

[4] Mengjiao Zhang. Research on the Protection of the Defendant's Rights in China's Criminal Procedure of Prompt Judgment [D]. Gansu University of Political Science and Law, 2021. DOI: 10.27785/d.cnki.ggszf.2021. 03-35.

[5] Cao Ning. Problems and Improvement in the Practice of Criminal Prompt Judgment Procedure [D]. Yantai University, 2019.

[6] Lu Wei, Fan Jun, Liao Yu, Li Jing Investigation on the pilot of the whole process criminal case quick judgment procedure in Haidian, Beijing -- A resource allocation model based on confession and punishment [J]. Application of Law, 2016 (04): 31-37.

[7] Zhengjie Suo. The Value of Criminal Procedure: Procedural Justice and Human Rights Protection [J]. China Legal Science, 2000 (05): 145-153. DOI: 10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2000.05-15.