Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2023, 5(1); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2023.050104.

Research on Production Mode and Eco-Label Strategy Selection Considering Consumers’ Environmental Awareness


Mengting Lin

Corresponding Author:
Mengting Lin

College of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China


This paper studies the enterprise’s selection of production mode and eco-label strategy. Using optimization methods, we find the optimal decisions of the enterprise, NGO, and government under different circumstances. We can obtain the following conclusions by analyzing and comparing the optimal decisions. No matter what kind of eco-label the enterprise adds, the mixed production mode is the best choice for the enterprise. When consumers’ environmental awareness is high, the production mode of only ordinary products is the worst choice. For the NGO and the government, the enterprise’s production mode of only eco-labeled products can bring the highest environmental benefits and social welfare. And the government label has a lower standard than the NGO label. By applying the government label, the enterprise can provide eco-label products at a lower price, thus gaining higher market share and profits.


Eco-label standards, Production mode, Product pricing

Cite This Paper

Mengting Lin. Research on Production Mode and Eco-Label Strategy Selection Considering Consumers’ Environmental Awareness. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 1: 20-27. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.050104.


[1] Vanclay J K, Shortiss J, Aulsebrook S, et al. Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2011, 34(1): 153-160.

[2] Amacher G S, Koskela E, Ollikainen M. Environment quality competition and eco-labeling[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, 47(2): 284-306. 

[3] Youssef A B, Lahmandi-Ayed R. Eco-labelling, competition and environment: Endogenization of labelling criteria[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2008, 41(2): 133-154.

[4] Sedjo R A, Swallow S K. Voluntary eco-labeling and the price premium[J]. Land economics, 2002, 78(2): 272-284.

[5] Zhang C, Liu Y, Han G. Two-stage pricing strategies of a dual-channel supply chain considering public green preference[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 151: 106988.

[6] Liu K, Li W, Jia F, et al. Optimal strategies of green product supply chains based on behaviour-based pricing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 335: 130288.

[7] Ling Y, Xu J, Ülkü M A. A game-theoretic analysis of the impact of government subsidy on optimal product greening and pricing decisions in a duopolistic market[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 338: 130028.

[8] Fadavi A, Jolai F, Taleizadeh A A. Green product design in a supply chain with considering marketing under competition and coordination[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24(10): 11721-11759.

[9] Awaga A L, Xu W, Liu L, et al. Evolutionary game of green manufacturing mode of enterprises under the influence of government reward and punishment[J]. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 2020, 15(4): 416-430.

[10] Zhang X, Jin Y, Shen C. Manufacturers’ green investment in a competitive market with a ordinary retailer[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276: 123164.

[11] Fischer C, Lyon T P. Competing environmental labels[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2014, 23(3): 692-716.

[12] Fischer C, Lyon T P. A theory of multitier ecolabel competition[J]. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2019, 6(3): 461-501.

[13] Heyes A, Martin S. Social labeling by competing NGOs: A model with multiple issues and entry[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(6): 1800-1813.