Welcome to Francis Academic Press

The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2023, 5(1); doi: 10.25236/FSST.2023.050111.

Critical Analysis of Sustainable Development Goal 13 Climate Action: A Case Study of Amazon


Wenqing Li

Corresponding Author:
Wenqing Li

School of Arts, Design, and Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK


It is well known that the massive production of greenhouse gases is causing global temperatures to rise. It is worth considering whether Amazon, the world's leading e-commerce company and one of the most popular brands, is currently taking steps to support Sustainable Development Goal 13(SDG 13) on climate change. This research will examine Amazon's stakeholder efforts to support SDG 13 and explore stakeholder behavior using a disciplined stakeholder analysis. This research will make recommendations for Amazon.com to reduce the number of deliveries and invest in new technologies, but it is clear that the downsides of these recommendations are also evident.


Amazon, SDG 13, Climate action, Net-zero carbon

Cite This Paper

Wenqing Li. Critical Analysis of Sustainable Development Goal 13 Climate Action: A Case Study of Amazon. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 1: 57-62. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.2023.050111.


[1] United Nations (2021). The sustainable development agenda. Retrieved 13th December, 2021 from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda-retired/

[2] Bennich, Weitz, N., & Carlsen, H. (2020). Deciphering the scientific literature on SDG interactions: A review and reading guide. The Science of the Total Environment, 728, 138405–138405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138405

[3] Amazon.com: Climate Pledge Friendly. Amazon.com. (2022). Retrieved 20 May 2022, from https: // www. amazon.com/b?node=21221607011.

[4] Enabling Sustainability for Our Customers. Sustainability - US. (2022). Retrieved 20 May 2022, from https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/people/customers. ("Enabling Sustainability for Our Customers", 2022)

[5] Driscoll, & Starik, M. (2004). The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013852.62017.0e

[6] Soytas, & Sari, R. (2009). Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1667–1675. https: // doi. org/ 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.014

[7] Adams, & Acheampong, A. O. (2019). Reducing carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy and democracy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118245. https: // doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. jclepro. 2019. 118245

[8] Jeswiet, & Kara, S. (2008). Carbon emissions and CES™ in manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 57(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.117

[9] Carbon Footprint. Sustainability - US. (2022). Retrieved 20 May 2022, from https://sustainability. aboutamazon.com/environment/sustainable-operations/carbon-footprint.

[10] Machlis, S. (1998). Amazon. com, Wal-Mart pushes Web Branding,'. ComputerWorld, 32(32), 13. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts | Academy of Management Review. Retrieved 4 January 2022, from https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

[11] Javalgi, Radulovich, L. P., Pendleton, G., & Scherer, R. F. (2005). Sustainable competitive advantage of internet firms: A strategic framework and implications for global marketers. International Marketing Review, 22(6), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330510630276

[12] Donaldson, & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65.

[13] Wagner Mainardes, Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2011). Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management Decision, 49(2), 226–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111109133

[14] Jones, & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1893929

[15] Rowley. (1997). Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.2307/259248

[16] Net-zero carbon by 2040. Theclimatepledge.com. (2022). Retrieved 20 May 2022, from https://www.theclimatepledge.com/#main-navigation.

[17] Pamucar, Deveci, M., Canitez, F., Paksoy, T., & Lukovac, V. (2021). A Novel Methodology for Prioritizing Zero-Carbon Measures for Sustainable Transport. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1093–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.016

[18] Chen, Gao, M., Mangla, S. K., Song, M., & Wen, J. (2020). Effects of technological changes on China's carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 153, 119938. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119938

[19] Myllykangas, P., Kujala, J., & Lehtimäki, H. (2011). Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency? Springer Link. Retrieved 10 January 2022, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-011-0945-3.