Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of Frontiers in Medicine, 2023, 5(1); doi: 10.25236/IJFM.2023.050112.

Research progress of maxillary molar distal displacement

Author(s)

Jie Yang, Xiaoyu Shi, Jing Nie

Corresponding Author:
Jing Nie
Affiliation(s)

Department of Orthodontics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Affiliated Stomatological Hospital), Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830054, China

Abstract

In the clinical work of orthodontics, it is a common problem for dentists to determine whether cases of crowding and convexity can be corrected without tooth extraction. In recent years, with the development of bracketless invisible orthodontic techniques and the wide application of anchorage nails in clinical practice, the method of pushing molar distalization to obtain the space required to align the teeth has been favored by more doctors. Molar distalization is more common in the maxilla, and exploring the limit of molar distalization depends on the maxillary retromolar space, mainly the length, width, and height of the maxillary tuberosity area. This article reviews the indications, boundaries, methods and effect evaluation of maxillary molar distalization, and provides some ideas and basis for the clinical treatment of maxillary molar distalization.

Keywords

Distalization of maxillary molars; maxillary tuberosity; implant anchorage; clear aligner

Cite This Paper

Jie Yang, Xiaoyu Shi, Jing Nie. Research progress of maxillary molar distal displacement. International Journal of Frontiers in Medicine (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 1: 66-70. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFM.2023.050112.

References

[1] Bai Ding, Editor-in-Chief Zhao Zhihe. Control and skills of orthodontic strategies [M]. Beijing: People 's Medical Publishing House, 2015; 3

[2] Apinhasmi W, Chompoopong S, Methathrathip D.Clinical Anatomy of the Posterior Maxilla Pertaining to LeFort I Osteotomy in Thais.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005, 18:323 – 329.

[3] Cheng Chaojie. Comparative observation of maxillary tuberosity bone mass before and after extraction of impacted maxillary third molars [D]. Guangzhou Medical University, 2020.DOI:10.27043/ d.cnki .ggzyc.2020.000045.

[4] Gong Ting. CBCT study of three-dimensional bone mass of maxillary tubercle and its relationship with third molar [D]. Anhui Medical University, 2020.DOI:10.26921/d.cnki .ganyu.2020.000060.

[5] Li Na. CBCT study of anatomical morphology of maxillary tuberosity in patients with different sagittal bone surface types [D]. Dalian Medical University, 2020.DOI: 10.26994/d. cnki. gdlyu. 2020.000040.

[6] Li Xiaoyan, Xu Juan, Liu Yongzhao, Liu Zhifeng. Clinical observation of extraoral arch pushing molar distalization in the treatment of Angle's ⅱ ~ 1 case with degree ⅲ deep coverage [J]. Journal of Clinical Stomatology, 2012, 28 (12): 755-757.

[7] Wang Lei, Duan Yinzhong, Shen Huan, Yao Wei. Effect of extraoral arch pushing molar distalization on root resorption [J]. Journal of Clinical Stomatology, 2007 (07): 421-423.

[8] Hilgers J J. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. [J]. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO, 1992, 26 (11): 706-14.

[9] Bozkaya Erdal et al. Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance. [J]. The Angle orthodontist, 2020, 90 (2): 194-201.

[10] Nissen Shannon Hilgers. The Pendulum Appliance for Class II Non-Compliance Therapy. [J]. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO, 2017, 51 (9).

[11] Shetty Sushruth, Maurya Rajkumar, Raj H V Pruthvi, Patil Anand. Comparison of the Pendulum appliance and the Jones Jig: A comparative prospective study. [J]. European journal of dentistry, 2017, 11 (3).

[12] Guo Jun, Fa Yonghong, Cai Xingwei, Huang Changcheng, Yan Xin. Comparison of Implant and Pendulum Appliance in Distalization of Maxillary Molars [J]. Chinese Journal of Cosmetic Medicine, 2007 (08): 1120-1123.

[13] Shi Xinqin, Zhang Caidi, Li Xianglin, Lu Bai. Clinical comparative study of Frog molar distalizer and Cetlin molar pushing method [J]. Shaanxi Medical Journal, 2014, 43 (06): 683-685.

[14] Yang Yong, Zhao Jilin, Cen Yufeng. Distally mobile maxillary molars using modified GMD [J]. Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2013, 29 (02): 292-294.

[15] Carano Aldo, Siciliani Giuseppe, Bowman S Jay. Treatment of skeletal open bite with a device for rapid molar intrusion: a preliminary report. [J]. The Angle orthodontist, 2005, 75 (5).

[16] Ruan Xiaohui, Dai Haitao, Liu Haixia. Clinical application of microimplant anchorage in pushing molars distally [J]. Stomatology, 2014, 34 (06):444-446.DOI:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx 2014. 06.012.

[17] Li Zhifang, Wang Weicai, Mai Ideal. Effect of distalization molars without brackets in the treatment of mild to moderate crowding of upper anterior teeth [J]. Prevention and Treatment of Oral Diseases, 2018, 26 (05): 314-319.

[18] Chen Lin, Wu Jiahua, Qu Weiwei, Lin Jiong, Huang Wenbin, Xia Zeyang, Tan Jiali. Evaluation of the efficacy of clear aligner in the distal transfer of maxillary molars [J]. Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2017, 33 (02): 203-207.

[19] Cheng Xinyu. CBCT evaluation of the effect of rigid connection of microimplant nails assisted clear aligner in distalization of maxillary molars [D]. Nanchang University, 2020. DOI:10.27232/d. cnki.gnchu.2020.000348.

[20] Chen Wenxia. Clinical effect of molar distalization technique pushed by clear aligner [D]. Fujian Medical University, 2019.DOI:10.27020/d.cnki .gfjyu.2019.000244.