The legal provisions on objection to jurisdiction are scattered in the legal provisions of the pretrial procedure of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China and relevant judicial interpretations, and the content of the provisions is rough and the directivity is unclear. The party who raises the objection to jurisdiction is precisely using the loophole of the system to abuse the right of objection to jurisdiction in the civil procedure law. Therefore, this paper summarizes the reasons for the abuse of objection to civil jurisdiction in China, puts forward specific measures to limit the abuse of civil jurisdiction, and promotes the improvement of the system.

Wang Xiaoqing. Research on the reasons and regulation of the abuse of the objection system of civil procedure jurisdiction. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology (2023), Vol. 5, Issue 2: 65-69. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2023.050211.

[1] Wang Xueyu. (2020).The Application Dilemma and Outlet of Response Jurisdiction under the Registration System, Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law. (02), 192.

[2] Wang Fuhua. (2016).On the sharing of civil judicial costs. China Social Sciences (2), 93-113+ 206.

[3] Liu Tianchang. (2019).How to pay the acceptance fee for the case of objection to jurisdiction. People's Court News (7), 58.

[4] Chen Ning. (2022). Legal regulation of the abuse of the objection system of civil litigation jurisdiction. Yunnan Normal University (05), 10-32.

[5] Liu Qian. (2022). Research on the system of objection to the jurisdiction of civil litigation. Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang University (03).6-18.