Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Sport Research, 2023, 5(2); doi: 10.25236/FSR.2023.050204.

On the Process Control of Track and Field Training: A Systematic Review

Author(s)

Junbo Zhang

Corresponding Author:
Junbo Zhang
Affiliation(s)

Public Course Teaching Department, Guangzhou Panyu Polytechnic, Guangzhou, China

Abstract

The training theory and methods of track and field sports have important contributions to the development of sports training. In the field of sports training, track and field sports belong to the sports group dominated by physical fitness. This paper summarizes the theory of track and field training cycle, the theory of exercise load control, the model of training process control and the theory of track and field training process control through the methods of literature and logical analysis. The research on the theory of exercise load control is based on the ability to adapt to the human body, while the research on the control model in the training process is from the aspects of mathematics and special training. The research on the physical fitness of track and field athletes, the endurance of training intensity and the sports content shows a trend of cross-integration and application. Although the above research has some limitations, it also lays a solid theoretical foundation for the exercise load theory and the training process control theory.

Keywords

track and field sports, sports training, physical fitness, training process, control theory

Cite This Paper

Junbo Zhang. On the Process Control of Track and Field Training: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Sport Research (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 2: 18-22. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSR.2023.050204.

References

[1] Phogat W S,Ahlawat R P. Relationship of selected bio-motor variables to the performance of 400 meter male sprinters[J]. 2015, 12(4) : 531 -534.

[2] Coetzee D. Strength, running speed, agility and balance profiles of 9-to 10-year-old learners: Nw-child study [J]. South Afri-can Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 2016,38( 1) : 13-30.

[3] Gaudino P, Laia F M, Alberti G, et al. Monitoring training in elite soccer players: systematic bias between running speedand metabolic power data [J]. Int J Sports Med, 2013, 34(11): 963 -968.

[4] Malisoux L, Nielsen Ro, Urhausen A, et al. A step towards understanding the mechanisms of running-related injuries [J]. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2015, 18(5): 523-528.

[5] Seal A, Kerac M. Operational implications of using 2006 World Health Organization growth standards in nutrition pro-grammes: Secondary data analysis [J]. Multicenter Study, 2007, 12(6): 23-28.

[6] Thornton H R, Delaney J A, DUTHIE G M, et al. Developing athlete monitoring systems in team sports: Data analysis and visualization[J]. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2019, 14(6):698-705.

[7] Wing C. Monitoring athlete load: Data collection methods and practical recommendations [J]. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 2018, 40(4) : 26-39.

[8] Fleming P, Young C, Dixon S, et al. Athlete and coach perceptions of technology needs for evaluating running performance [J]. Sports Engineering, 2010, 13(1): 1-18.

[9] Bourdon P C, Cardinale M, Murray A, et al. Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement [J]. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2017, 12(S2): 161-170.

[10] Gabbett T J, Nassis G P, Oetter E, et al. The athlete monitoring cycle: A practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data [J]. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2017, 51(20): 1451 -1452.