With the continuous development of China's education industry, curriculum reform is gradually deepening. As a new form of curriculum teaching, openness plays a huge role in improving the quality of school teaching, promoting student development, and leading teacher professionalization. However, due to factors such as utilitarianism, teachers' vague teaching theory, incomplete teaching evaluation mechanism, leaders' formalism and so on, the open class has appeared dissimilation tendencies such as faking, showing off, and face project, which completely violates the original intention of its creation, deviates from its original operation track, and makes it unable to play a huge positive energy role. Therefore, reflecting on these issues and proposing reasonable solutions to promote the return of open classes to their true nature has become an urgent task in the field of education in the new era.

Hong Jiang. An Analysis of the Deviation and Return of Open Classes in the New Era. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 9: 77-81. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2023.050915.

[1] He Yuhai, Cai Baolai. Effective Open Class: Essential Connotation and Evaluation Criteria [J]. Curriculum, Textbooks, Teaching Methods, 2013, 33 (12): 36-42

[2] Wang Xiaohong. On the Practice Deviation and Return of Open Courses [J]. Journal of Northwest Adult Education College, 2018, 134 (02): 63-67

[3] Li Zhenfeng, Wang Zaiyong, Li Ling. The Return and Construction of Open Textbooks [J]. Chinese Journal of Education, 2011, 213 (01): 50-53

[4] Chen Luyao. Open Course on Saving "Deterioration" [J]. Journal of Chongqing Electronic Engineering Vocational College, 2015, 24 (02): 125-128