This passage analyzes the aesthetic isomorphism of Zen poems, tea and Simple landscape and further develops the core of why the aesthetics has its strong vitality, from the aspects of the relationship of the mutual development of the three and the influencing factor of them. And on this basis, this passage analyzes the isomorphism of the three based on the ideology and forms. This passage expects to build a bridge of the different forms of Zen aesthetics and to explore the law of the common aesthetic feeling that surpasses history and forms so that we can pave the way for the research of the Zen aesthetics afterwards and bring in more inspirations.

Deng Tingyin. The Research of the Comparison of the Aesthetic Isomorphism of Zen Poems, Zen Tea and Simple Landscape. Frontiers in Educational Research (2019) Vol. 2 Issue 11: 95-101. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2019.021117.

[1] Pi Chaogang (1997). “Understanding” -- the core category of Zen aesthetic. methodology. Journal of Southwest Minzu University, no.6, pp.129-130.
[2] Pi Chaogang (2015). Historical status of works on Zen poetry. Journal of. Southwest Minzu University, no.1, pp.201-202.
[3] Qiu Zihua (2014). Heterogeneous isomorphism between Zen and postmodernism. Journal of Nanjing University, no.7, pp.89-90.
[4] Zhao Wenbin (2010). Su Huang's poetry and Zen court case. Jinan: University, 2010.
[5] Yu Jisheng (2009). “A tea Guest at Fenning at the Beginning” -Huang. Tingjian and his works on praising the tea. Appreciation of Famous Works, no.7, pp.190-191.
[6] Li Haijie (2007). Origin and Evolution of Chinese Zen Tea Culture. Shaanxi. Normal University.
[7] Liu Haiyan (2009). Comparison of Chinese and Japanese Gardens from the. Perspective of Zen Culture. Cenral China architecture, no.12, pp.232-233.
[8] Tang Jiefang (2011). Garden art of Japanese tea court. Sea of Arts, no.7, pp.12.