Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2024, 7(2); doi: 10.25236/FER.2024.070209.

Diversified teaching methods: A practical research from the students’ perspectives

Author(s)

Ling Sun1, Yadi Yang2

Corresponding Author:
Ling Sun
Affiliation(s)

1School of Business Administration, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China

2School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, China

Abstract

It has become an urgent demand for talent in terms of the national innovation and industrial development in China. Minister of Education pointed out that we should adhere to the orientations of the fundamental education, which would promote the revitalization of undergraduate studies. In this article, through online survey and offline interviews, it is getting information and collecting data according to the students’ learning experiences via the course of Strategic Management.  It has evaluated the practices of diversified teaching methods via Strategic Management, analyzed the effects of different methods from the students attitudes, and put forward corresponding suggestions for improvement. This research has demonstrated for courses like Strategic Management, utilizing diversified teaching methods could provide practical experiences and ideas for students, which make the course become more suitable for the new requirements in colleges and universities.

Keywords

Diversified teaching methods; teaching reform; students’ perspectives

Cite This Paper

Ling Sun, Yadi Yang. Diversified teaching methods: A practical research from the students’ perspectives. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 2: 54-61. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070209.

References

[1] Weiqing Lin. Multi-adaptive Education: theories and practices[J]. Courses, Material and Methods, 2018, 38(02):25-33.

[2] Nan-Chang Yang and Zhi-Xian Zhong. The development of multiple intelligences curriculum[J]. Education and Research in Jiangxi, 2003, 49(04):22-24+26.

[3] Jaime Andrés Bayona, and Delio Ignacio Castañeda. Influence of personality and motivation on case method teaching[J]. International Journal of Management Education, 2017, 15(3).

[4] Satoshi Takahashi, Toru B. Takahashi, Akiko Orita, Atsushi Yoshikawa, and Takao Terano. The More You Know, the Easier It Is to Learn: Requirements for a Support System to Facilitate Case Method Learning [J]. Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education, 2017, 15(1).

[5] Shu-Chen Yen, Yafen Lo, Angela Lee, and Judel May Enriquez. Learning online, offline, and in-between: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2018, 23(5).

[6] Alexander Herzner, and Katharina Stucken. Reporting on sustainable development with student inclusion as a teaching method[J]. The International Journal of Management Education, 2020, 18(1).

[7] Mehdi Farashahi, and Mahdi Tajeddin. Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations[J]. International Journal of Management Education, 2018, 16(1).

[8] Deyu Li. The Application of Open Teaching Model in the Teaching of National Economic Management Course[J]. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2019, 2(3).

[9] Jian-guo Wei. Practical Exploration of Undergraduate Classroom Teaching Reform: a Case Study of Shanxi Normal University[J]. Chinese Education & Society, 2018, 51(4).

[10] Hashem Alshurafat, Claire Beattie, Gregory Jones, and John Sands. Perceptions of the usefulness of various teaching methods in forensic accounting education[J]. Accounting Education, 2020, 29(2).