Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2024, 6(2); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2024.060234.

Risk Assessment of Water Saving Management Contract Based on Normal Cloud Model

Author(s)

Fan Yang, Xinlu Lu

Corresponding Author:
Fan Yang
Affiliation(s)

School of Management Engineering and Business, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, China

Abstract

The Water Saving Management Contract (WSMC) is the novel market-oriented water-saving service model specifically designed for water conservation. It uniquely shifts the risk burden away from water users to water-saving service providers, making risk assessment a pivotal consideration for project participants in devising investment strategies. Drawing upon cloud models that reconcile qualitative and quantitative uncertainties, this paper proposes a risk assessment model for WSMC grounded in a generalized cloud model framework. Firstly, a comprehensive evaluation system integrating qualitative and quantitative indicators is established. Weights are determined using a combination weighting method based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and entropy weight method. Secondly, the standard cloud model is constructed based on standard level division. Evaluation indicators are then scored based on historical literature, expert opinions, and project-specific implementation conditions to formulate a comprehensive evaluation cloud model. Finally, through case validation, the findings are presented using cloud diagrams to confirm the model's feasibility.

Keywords

Water Saving Management Contract; Risk Analysis; Normal Cloud Model; Combination Weighting Method

Cite This Paper

Fan Yang, Xinlu Lu. Risk Assessment of Water Saving Management Contract Based on Normal Cloud Model. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2024) Vol. 6, Issue 2: 235-242. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2024.060234.

References

[1] Hojjati-Najafabadi, A., Mansoorianfar, M., Liang, T., Shahin, K. and Karimi-Maleh, H. (2022). A review on magnetic sensors for monitoring of hazardous pollutants in water resources. Science of The Total Environment, 824, 153844.

[2] Karimidastenaei, Z., Avellán, T., Sadegh, M., Kløve, B. and Haghighi, A. T. (2022). Unconventional water resources: Global opportunities and challenges. Science of the Total Environment, 827, 154429.

[3] Yang, D. and Yang, Y. (2021). Hydrological cycle and water resources in a changing world: A review. Geography and Sustainability, 2(2), 115-122.

[4] Wang, W., Ren, L., Deng, C., Wang, Q. and Yu, J. (2022). The water-saving management contract in China: current status, existing problems, and countermeasure suggestions. Water, 14(19), 3116.

[5] Xie, H., You, J. and Yang, X. (2019). Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Contract Water Saving Management in Irrigation District. Sustainability, 11(20), 5772.

[6] Hu, H., Wang, X., Gao, Z. and Guo, H. (2021). A real option-based valuation model for Shared Water Saving Management Contract. Journal of cleaner production, 289, 125442.

[7] Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W. and Clark, D. B. (2014). Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3245-3250.

[8] Ma, W., Li, X. and Wang, X. (2021). Water Saving Management Contract, identification and ranking of risks based on life cycle and best-worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 127153.

[9] Li, Q., Shangguan, Z., Wang, M. Y., Yan, D., Zhai, R. and Wen, C. (2020). Risk assessment of China’s water-saving contract projects. Water, 12(10), 2689.

[10] Wang, T., Tang, W. and Du, L. (2016). Relationships among risk management, partnering, and contractor capability in international EPC project delivery[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(6), 04016017.

[11] Yang, Y., Tang, W. and Shen, W. (2019). Enhancing risk management by partnering in international EPC projects: Perspective from evolutionary game in chinese construction companies[J]. Sustainability, 11(19), 5332.

[12] Jokar, E., Aminnejad, B. and Lork, A. (2021). Assessing and prioritizing risks in public-private partnership (PPP) projects using the integration of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. Operations Research Perspectives, 8, 100190.

[13] Noorzai, E. (2021). Public–private partnership risks in conflict zones and solutions: case study for Afghanistan. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 27(1), 05021001.

[14] AL-Aga, S. F. R. and Burhan, A. M. (2023). Risk Assessment in BOT Contracts using AHP Technique. Journal of Engineering, 29(1), 61-75.

[15] Patel, T. D., Haupt, T. C. and Bhatt, T. (2020). Fuzzy probabilistic approach for risk assessment of BOT toll roads in Indian context. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(1), 251-269.

[16] Smith, J. and Jones, A. (2018). Qualitative Risk Analysis in Project Management: A Critical Review. Project Management Journal, 49(4), 87-97.

[17] Brown, C. and Williams, B. (2019). Exploring the Effectiveness of Qualitative Risk Analysis Techniques in Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 37(6), 1-15.

[18] Chen, L. and Wang, Y. (2021). Application of Qualitative Risk Analysis Methods in Environmental Engineering Projects: A Comparative Study. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, 111345.

[19] Kumar, S. and Gupta, R. (2022). Evaluation of Qualitative Risk Analysis Techniques for Healthcare Projects: A Case Study Approach. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 1-15.

[20] Liu, B., and Li, J. (2021). A New Fuzzy-Rough Set-Based Normal Cloud Model for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Information Sciences, 543, 87-104.

[21] Zhu, C. and Zhang, L. (2022). Normal Cloud Model Based Fault Diagnosis Method for Rolling Bearing in Wind Turbine Gearbox. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 161, 108070.

[22] Wang, L. and Liu, J. (2023). Normal Cloud Model for Risk Assessment of Cyber-Physical Systems: A Case Study of Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(1), 657-668.