Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2024, 7(6); doi: 10.25236/FER.2024.070629.

Government Approaches and Discussions on Addressing AIGC Challenges in Education

Author(s)

Yiqing Wang

Corresponding Author:
Yiqing Wang
Affiliation(s)

Institute of Modern Media Technology and Art, Shanghai Publishing and Printing College, Shanghai, China

Abstract

This paper analyzes the guidelines and approaches regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of education in five developed countries and regions: the United States, the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), Japan, and South Korea. The U.S. government advocates for the robust development of AI while protecting the rights of educators and students, aiming to reduce educational disparities. The EU adopts a strict regulatory framework to preempt potential risks associated with AI. The UK emphasizes the protection of data privacy and the effective utilization of AI to alleviate teachers' workload. Japan implements different AI usage policies for elementary students, teachers, and university students, highlighting the importance of AI literacy among educators. South Korea actively integrates AI into educational materials to achieve personalized learning and alleviate teachers' workload. Most countries balance risk management and development, placing them on the same level to reconcile innovation and regulation. Understanding these countries' diverse strategies facilitates a better understanding of how they tackle the complex challenges of AI in education, ensuring that technological advancements promote fairness and high-quality development in education.

Keywords

Government Approaches; AIGC; AIGC Challenges in Education

Cite This Paper

Yiqing Wang. Government Approaches and Discussions on Addressing AIGC Challenges in Education. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 6: 192-196. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070629.

References

[1] Yu Guoming. Reconstruction of social ecology under the rise of AGI[J]. People's Forum·Academic Frontier, 2023(14):58-65. DOI:10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2023.14.005.

[2] U.S. Department of Education. "U.S. Department of Education Shares Insights and Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence” 25 May. 2023. https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-shares-insights-and-recommendations-artificial-intelligence

[3] Council of Europe. "Council of Europe Standing Conference of Ministers of Education REGULATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION ” 22 November. 2023. https://rm.coe.int/regulating-artificial-intelligence-in-education-26th-session-council-o/1680ac9b7c

[4] UK Department for Education.Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education.26 Oct.2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/generative-artificial-intelligence-in-education/generative-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education

[5] Baek Seung-ho.Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education.Korean Education News.22.Feb.2024.https://www.hangyo.com/news/article.html?no=101009.

[6] KYODO NEWS.Japan publishes guidelines allowing limited use of AI in schools.4. July.2023. https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2023/07/ac1ce46ce503-japan-publishes-guidelines-allowing-limited-use-of-ai-in-schools.html.