Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2024, 7(7); doi: 10.25236/FER.2024.070710.

The Relationship among Shenzhen Junior High School EFL Students’ Motivation, Language Anxiety and Language Learning Outcomes in the MALL Context

Author(s)

Yuxiu Dai

Corresponding Author:
Yuxiu Dai
Affiliation(s)

Xiaode School, Shenzhen, China

Abstract

The use of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) has been promoted for some time to improve the language learning results of pupils. However, research into the effects of MALL on students' motivation, language anxiety, and real accomplishment is scarce. This study investigates Grade 7 and Grade 9 students in a Shenzhen state-run junior high school about their language learning motivation, anxiety, and the relationship between their language learning outcomes in the MALL context. Results showed that young adolescents' motivation to study English was influenced favourably by their parents but adversely by the pressure of the senior high school entrance exam; students who are facing the high school entrance examination suffer more from anxiety and have lower motivation than those in the first year of junior high school. This research calls for practicable policies to reduce the exam burdens for junior high school students in Shenzhen and change current pedagogical teaching methods for English teachers to motivate their students in EFL classes.

Keywords

Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL), Language Learning Motivation, Language Anxiety, Junior High School Students, English as a Foreign Language (EFL)

Cite This Paper

Yuxiu Dai. The Relationship among Shenzhen Junior High School EFL Students’ Motivation, Language Anxiety and Language Learning Outcomes in the MALL Context. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 7: 70-77. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070710.

References

[1] Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope's construct of foreign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 155-168.

[2] Alrabai, F. (2014). A model of foreign language anxiety in the Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 82. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n7p82 

[3] Aydin, S. (2016). A qualitative research on foreign language teaching anxiety. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2232

[4] Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson.

[5] Chang, M.-M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction: An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 217-230.

[6] Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00461520. 1991.9653137 

[7] Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001315X

[8] Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications: Attitudes, orientations, and motivations. Language Learning, 53(S1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.53222

[9] Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., & Moorcroft, R. (1985). The role of attitudes and motivation in second language learning: Correlational and experimental considerations. Language Learning, 35(2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01025.x

[10] Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

[11] Iwashita, N., McNamara, T., & Elder, C. (2001). Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information-processing approach to task design. Language Learning, 51(3), 401-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00160

[12] Liu, J.-H. (2011). A study on learning motivation of high school students. Overseas English, 12, 47-48.

[13] Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc. 

[14] Önal, N., Çevik, K. K., & Şenol, V. (2022). The effect of SOS Table learning environment on mobile learning tools acceptance, motivation and mobile learning attitude in English language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(5), 834-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1690529

[15] Peng, J. E. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney papers in TESOL, 2(1), 33-59.

[16] Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.

[17] Shagufta Moghal, Muhamamd Mooneeb Ali, Zoobia Asad, Dr. Muhammad Asif, & Amina Shahid. (2020). Utilizing mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) for teaching English to non-formal learners in Pakistan. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 7(2), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020 (70-81)

[18] Shamsi, A. F., Altaha, S., & Gilanlioglu, I. (2019). The Role of M-Learning in Decreasing Speaking Anxiety for EFL Learners. Online Submission, 2(1), 276-282.

[19] Walker, A., & White, G. (2013). Technology enhanced language learning: Connective theory and practice. 

[20] Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art.

[21] Zhen, L. S., & Hashim, H. (2022). The usage of MALL in learners’ readiness to speak English. Sustainability, 14(23), 16227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14231622