This paper explores the methodology of hybrid teaching evaluation, tailored to the characteristics of the CAID series courses in our industrial design program and the current state of industrial design development. The study designs a suitable teaching evaluation system for CAID courses by considering professional characteristics and the goals outlined in the industrial design talent cultivation plan. The research identifies a multidimensional, multi-level teaching approach and project-oriented instructional design. By examining student evaluation strategies and course evaluation strategies, we construct a hybrid evaluation system for the CAID series courses, which has received positive feedback in practice. This framework can be extended to evaluate other courses.

Tan Jinhua, Teng Jian. Research on Teaching Reform of Industrial Design CAID Series Courses Based on Hybrid Teaching Evaluation System. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 7: 94-100. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070714.

[1] Gibson, N. (1993). Quality assurance through course validation and review. Quality assurance for university teaching, 78-91.

[2] Fourie, M. (2000). A system approach to quality assurance and self-evaluation: national perspectives. South African Journal of Higher Education, 14(2), 50-55.

[3] Holsombach-Ebner, C. (2013). Quality assurance in large scale online course production. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(2), n2.

[4] Towers, S. J., Alderman, L., Nielsen, S., & McLean, S. V. (2010, June). A risk-based approach to course quality assurance. In Australian Quality Forum 2010: Higher Education: Quality in Uncertain Times (AUQF2010) (pp. 116-128).

[5] Thurab‐Nkhosi, D., & Marshall, S. (2009). Quality management in course development and delivery at the University of the West Indies Distance Education Centre. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(3), 264-280.

[6] Zhang, W., & Cheng, Y. L. (2012). Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 66-82.

[7] Steinhardt, I., Schneijderberg, C., Götze, N., Baumann, J., & Krücken, G. (2017). Mapping the quality assurance of teaching and learning in higher education: the emergence of a specialty? Higher Education, 74, 221-237.

[8] Park, J. Y. (2014). Course evaluation: Reconfigurations for learning with learning management systems. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 992-1006.

[9] McGahan, S. J., Jackson, C. M., & Premer, K. (2015). Online course quality assurance: Development of a quality checklist. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 126-140.

[10] Kidney, G., Cummings, L., & Boehm, A. (2007, January). Toward a quality assurance approach to e-learning courses. In International Journal on E-learning (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 17-30). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

[11] Bornmann, L., Mittag, S., & Danie, H. D. (2006). Quality assurance in higher education–meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany. Higher Education, 52, 687-709.

[12] Mizikaci, F. (2006). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(1), 37-53.

[13] Asif, M., & Raouf, A. (2013). Setting the course for quality assurance in higher education. Quality & Quantity, 47, 2009-2024.

[14] Brown, P. (2009). CAD: Do computers aid the design process after all? Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 2(1), 52-66.

[15] Baig, M. I., Shuib, L., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2020). Big data in education: a state of the art, limitations, and future research directions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-23.

[16] Haden, C., Flikkema, P., Weller, T., Frolik, J., Verrei-Berenback, W., & Shiroma, W. (2009, June). The Assessment Of A Hybrid On Line/In Class Course Developed At Multiple Universities. In 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 14-1179).

[17] Chen, X. (2021, April). Design of a hybrid classroom teaching quality evaluation system based on information technology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1852, No. 3, p. 032025). IOP Publishing.

[18] Jia, H. (2024). A study on evaluation of english hybrid teaching courses based on AHP and K-means. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e2074.

[19] Li, K. C., Wong, B. T., Kwan, R., Wu, M. M., & Cheung, S. K. (2022, June). Evaluation of hybrid teaching effectiveness: The perspective of academics. In International Conference on Blended Learning (pp. 265-274). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[20] Yin, Q., Huang, Q., & Song, S. (2024). Online and offline hybrid teaching evaluation and monitoring system based on hierarchical analysis method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation algorithm. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing, 26(1), 39-47.

[21] Li, J. (2023, August). Evaluation Method of Hybrid Teaching Reform System Based on the Analysis of Characteristics of Higher Vocational Schools. In International Conference on E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (pp. 190-206). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. 

[22] Liu, X. Y., Lu, C., Zhu, H., Wang, X., Jia, S., Zhang, Y., ... & Wang, Y. F. (2022). Assessment of the effectiveness of BOPPPS-based hybrid teaching model in physiology education. BMC medical education, 22(1), 217.

[23] Wu, G., Zheng, J., & Zhai, J. (2023). RETRACTED: Individualized learning evaluation model based on hybrid teaching. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 60(1_suppl), 2047-2061.

[24] Li, K. C., Wong, B. T., Kwan, R., Chan, H. T., Wu, M. M., & Cheung, S. K. (2023). Evaluation of hybrid learning and teaching practices: The perspective of academics. Sustainability, 15(8), 6780.

[25] Wu, H. Y., Chen, J. K., Chen, I. S., & Zhuo, H. H. (2012). Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model. Measurement, 45(5), 856-880.

[26] Zeng, Y. (2020). Evaluation of physical education teaching quality in colleges based on the hybrid technology of data mining and hidden markov model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(1), 4-15.

[27] Trentin, G., & Bocconi, S. (2014). The effectiveness of hybrid solutions in higher education: A call for hybrid-teaching instructional design. Educational Technology, 12-21.

[28] Weng, S. S., Liu, Y., & Chuang, Y. C. (2019). Reform of Chinese universities in the context of sustainable development: teacher evaluation and improvement based on hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model. Sustainability, 11(19), 5471.

[29] Bao, L., & Yu, P. (2021). Evaluation method of online and offline hybrid teaching quality of physical education based on mobile edge computing. Mobile Networks and Applications, 26(5), 2188-2198.

[30] Başaran, M. A., Kalaycı, N., & Atay, M. T. (2011). A novel hybrid method for better evaluation: Evaluating university instructors teaching performance by combining conventional content analysis with fuzzy rule based systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12565-12568.

[31] Sarwar, S., Razzaq, Z., & Saeed, I. (2014). Evaluation of interactive lectures: an innovative approach employed in a hybrid teaching system. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 10(3-4).

[32] Wang, H., & Wang, Z. (2024, May). Research on the Construction of a Hybrid Teaching Evaluation System for Physical Education Courses in Universities. In 2024 5th International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE 2024) (pp. 317-331). Atlantis Press.

[33] Sherrill, W. W., & Truong, K. D. (2010). Traditional teaching vs. hybrid instruction: Course evaluation and student performance in health services management education. Journal of Health Administration Education, 27(4), 253-268.

[34] Konstan, J. A., Walker, J. D., Brooks, D. C., Brown, K., & Ekstrand, M. D. (2015). Teaching recommender systems at large scale: Evaluation and lessons learned from a hybrid MOOC. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), 1-23.

[35] Jahantigh, F. F., & Ostovare, M. (2020). Application of a hybrid method for performance evaluation of teaching hospitals in Tehran. Quality Management in Healthcare, 29(4), 210-217.