"The Integration of Science and Education" aims to innovate, integrate, and share educational models and methods by focusing on technological advancements. This work explores the stages of in-class experiments, CDIO (Conceive-Design- Implement-Operate) experiments, and open innovation experiments, and proposes solutions for each instructional stage based on their characteristics. In the in-class experiment stage, advanced technology is introduced into classroom teaching using equipment as a medium. In CDIO experiments, simple research topics and research organizational forms are introduced, allowing students to have an initial experience with research by dividing the tasks and steps of the topics into research nodes. In stages such as open innovation experiments, teaching activities facilitate research by offering preliminary groundwork for projects. By organically combining these three stages, students' engineering abilities are greatly enhanced, and their innovative spirit is cultivated.

Yanjie Guo, Lei Yang, Zengyao Yang, Shuanglu Quan, Yongquan Wang. Exploration and Practice of the Integration of Science and Education in the Development of Engineering Abilities. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 9: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.070901.

[1] Magalhães Rodrigo, Proper Henderik A., Model-enabled design and engineering of organisations and their enterprises, Organizational Design and Enterprise Engineering, 2017, 1: 1-12.

[2] Du Jian, Study on talent training mode of software engineering based on CDIO background, International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society, 2018, 2: 55-57.

[3] Xia Meng, Thinking about the construction of the OBE-based industry-education integration information technology talent training model, Frontiers in Educational Research, 2023, 6: 24-30.

[4] Rivera Felipe Muñoz-La, Hermosilla Pamela, Delgadillo Jean, Echeverría Dayan, The sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a basis for innovation skills for engineers in the industry 4.0 context, Sustainability, 2020, 12: 6622.

[5] Azmi Aini Najwa, Kamin Yusri, Noordin Muhammad Khair, Towards industrial revolution 4.0: employers' expectations on fresh engineering graduates, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2018, 7: 267-272.

[6] Ghobakhloo Morteza, The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2018, 29: 910-936.

[7] Barak Moshe, Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solving taxonomies, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2013, 11: 316-333.

[8] Borrego Maura, Henderson Charles, Increasing the use of evidence‐based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies, Journal of Engineering Education, 2014, 103: 220-252.

[9] Edström Kristina, Kolmos Anette, PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development, European Journal of Engineering Education, 2014, 39: 539-555.

[10] Kartashova Anna, Shirko Tatiana, Khomenko Igor, Naumova Ludmila, Educational activity of national research universities as a basis for integration of science, education and industry in regional research and educational complexes, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 214: 619-627.

[11] Linn Marcia C., Gerard Libby, Matuk Camillia, McElhaney, Kevin W., Science education: From separation to integration, Review of Research in Education, 2016, 40: 529-587.

[12] Wang Chien-hsing, Ke Yi-Ting, Wu Jin-Tong, Hsu Wen-Hua, Collaborative action research on technology integration for science learning, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012, 21: 125-132.

[13] Litzinger Thomas, Lattuca Lisa R, Hadgraft Roger, Newstetter Wendy C, Engineering education and the development of expertise, Journal of Engineering Education, 2011, 100: 123-150.

[14] Merritt Eileen G., Chiu Jennie, Peters-Burton Erin, Bell Randy, Teachers’ integration of scientific and engineering practices in primary classrooms, Research in Science Education, 2018, 48: 1321–1337.

[15] Broo Didem Gürdür, Kaynak Okyay, Sait Sadiq M., Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0, Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2022, 25: 100311.

[16] Xie Xiaozhen, Research on the mechanism design of “industry-education integration”, Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2019, 5: 81-87.

[17] Gao Fei, Zhang Peng, Performance evaluation of industry-education integration in higher vocational colleges: an evidence from China, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2020, 15: 208-219.

[18] Raweewan Morrakot, Kojima Fumio, Digital lean manufacturing-Collaborative university-industry education in systems design for lean transformation, Procedia Manufacturing, 2020, 45: 183-188.

[19] Wang Yongquan, Hu Gailing, Duan Yugang, Chen Xuefeng, Course teaching under the outcome based education framework: design, implementation and evaluation, Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2019, 3: 62-68+75.

[20] Guo Yanjie, Yang Lijuan, Zhang Liuyang, Sun Yu, Chen Xuefeng, Li Bing, Quan Shuanglu, Exploration and practice of experimental teaching model of “Engineering finite element and numerical calculation”, Experimental Technology and Management, 2020, 37, 11: 199-204+240.

[21] Guo Yanjie, Li Haoqi, Yang Lijuan, Zhang Xingwu, Wang Shibin, Cai Gaigai, Development of rotating mechanical misalignment fault simulation experiment platform, Experimental Technology and Management, 2020, 37: 114-117+128.