The correlation between the three types of influencing factors, namely "student’s factors", "teachers factors" and "teaching mediators", and the students' learning gains in Curriculum ideology and politics in the seven types of general elective courses was analyzed. The analysis of the relationship found that: (1)teaching mediators, to a certain extent, affect the students' learning gains in all kinds of general elective courses, and innovation can be down in the form of teaching, teacher-student interaction, etc.; (2)the personal ability and comprehensive quality of the teachers, and the teachers' charisma, to a certain extent, affect the students' change of viewpoints and stances, the establishment of values, and the change of attitudes; (3)the students' personal interests and the communication between classmates have little influence on students' learning gains. The construction and implementation of general elective courses need to give more consideration to students' demands and interests.

Sun Yihan, Sun Xiaoxi. Analysis of Undergraduates' Learning Gains of Curriculum Ideology and Politics in General Elective Courses and Their Influencing Factors: Based on the Mixed Research of 11 Public Universities in Yunnan Province. Frontiers in Educational Research (2024) Vol. 7, Issue 10: 153-161. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2024.071025.

[1] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Guidelines for the Construction of Civics and Politics in Higher Education Programs [EB/OL]. (2020-05-28)[2023-09-27]. http://www.moe. gov.cn/ srcsite/ A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html

[2] Gao Deyi, Zong Aidong. From ideological and political courses to course ideology and politics: Constructing the ideological and political education curriculum system of colleges and universities from a strategic height[J]. China Higher Education, 2017(01): 43-46.

[3] Dong Birong. On the Essence and Connotation of Curriculum Civics[J]. Finance and Accounting Newsletter,2022,(12):21-26. DOI:10.16144/j. CNKI. ISSN 1002-8072.2022.12.002.

[4] Xu Xiaojun. Discussion on the connotation and elements of Civic Politics in Higher Education Programs [J]. Jiangsu Higher Education,2021, (03):101-104. DOI:10.13236/j. CNKI. jshe.2021.03.016. 

[5] Xu Xinghua, Hu Daping. Several Important Issues to be Grasped in Promoting Civic Politics in Curriculum [J]. China University Teaching,2021, (05):60-64.

[6] Guo Gen. Theoretical Connotation, Practical Deviation and Empirical Review of the Construction of Civics and Politics in Colleges and Universities' Curriculum[J]. Journal of National College of Education Administration,2023, (06):52-60.

[7] Liu Jianjun. Curriculum Civics: Connotation, Characteristics and Path[J]. Education Research, 2020, 41(09):28-33. 

[8] Zhang Xujing. Civic and political construction of higher education curriculum: value implication-theoretical connotation-implementation path[J]. Secondary School Politics Teaching Reference, 2022 (12): 26-29.

[9] Li Gonglian, Liu Ying. Curriculum Civics: Implications, Values and Practices[J]. Educational Theory and Practice, 2023, 43(27):24-28.

[10] Yi Peng, Wu Nengbiao, Wang Jinjun. The construction of new agricultural courses' ideology and politics: value, follow and path[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Science Edition), 2022, 48(03):78-87. DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xdsk.2022.03.007.

[11] Zhang Rong, An Ning, LI Weiwei. Connotation, value and path of ideological politics of art education program in colleges and universities[J]. Secondary school politics teaching reference, 2023(35): 56-58. 

[12] Qiu Renfu. Theoretical Explanation of "Curriculum Civics" and "Civics Program" in the Same Direction [J]. Ideological Education Research,2018, (04):109-113.

[13] Wan Linyan, Yao Yinzhu. The same direction of the teaching content of "Civic politics course" and "curriculum Civic politics"[J]. China University Teaching,2018, (12):52-55.

[14] Shi Shuchen. Correctly Grasp the Relationship between "Curriculum Civics" and Civics Program [J]. Thought Theory Education,2018,(11):57-61.DOI:10.16075/j.cnki.cn31-1220/g4.2018.11.010.

[15] Xu Qinfa, Liang Xuanming. Same direction-peer-construction: A new exploration of collaborative education between "curriculum Civics" and "Civics program"[J]. Journal of Ideological Education, 2024(04):134-141.DOI:10.16580/j.sxlljydk.2024.04.014.

[16] Li Si. Speaking deeply - speaking thoroughly - speaking alive: Exploration of digital technology-enabled curriculum Civics[J]. Secondary School Politics Teaching Reference,2023,(27):37-39.

[17] Hu H. The technological embedding and value scrutinization of curriculum ideology in the age of intelligence [J]. Theory Guide,2023,(11):124-131.

[18] Yi Zhongying. Exploration of countermeasures for the high-quality development of curriculum ideology in higher vocational colleges and universities under the vision of technological empowerment [J]. Vocational and Technical Education,2023,44(32):43-47.

[19] Jiang Jie, LUO Xianke. Exploration of the path of the construction of "course politics" in colleges and universities in the new era[J]. China Vocational and Technical Education,2018(32):84-87.

[20] Li Guojuan. Five key links must be firmly grasped in the construction of curriculum ideology and politics [J]. China Higher Education,2017,(Z3):28-29.

[21] Fei Xiaotong. The culture that grows out of the land [M]. Beijing: Qunyan Publishing House, 2007.

[22] Lu Jie. The Contemporary Discourse of Moral Education [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2005:119.