In light of the current challenges faced by the “dual-supervisor system” in the cultivation of professional degree master’s students—such as institutional formalization, superficial collaboration, and insufficient practical impact—this study takes provincial public universities offering education-related professional master’s programs as an example. It explores strategies to integrate on-campus and off-campus educational resources, maximize the advantages of the dual-supervisor system, and proposes solutions from conceptual, institutional, and practical perspectives. These recommendations aim to enhance the quality of cultivation. 

Lei Jiang, Shiyuan Wang. Analysis of the "Dual-Supervisor System" Pathway for Full-Time Professional Master's Students in Education. Frontiers in Educational Research (2025) Vol. 8, Issue 2: 122-127. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2025.080218.

[1] Fan Zheng, Niu Menglong, Huang Fenglin, et al. Research on the Teaching Reform of Chemical Engineering Courses under the Background of Engineering Education Professional Accreditation [J]. University Education, 2019(12): 48-51.

[2] Xin Jun’gen. Implementation Difficulties and Path Construction of the "Double Mentor System" for Full-time Master of Education in Preschool Education [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2020(05): 1-9. 

[3] Tang Weimin, Shen Junyu. Research on the Problems of Teaching Practice Ability of Full-time Education Masters - Based on the Survey and Analysis of 190 Education Master Training Institutions across the Country [J]. Higher Science Education, 2024(05): 57-64.