Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2025, 7(12); doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2025.071214.
Fangyan Ma, Haiping Nong
Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou, Hainan, China, 571126
The synergistic development of green innovation (GI), ecological efficiency (EE), and the digital economy (DE) is pivotal for achieving China's high-quality economic development and ecological civilization goals. This study establishes a comprehensive evaluation index system for these three subsystems. Utilizing panel data from 30 Chinese provinces (excluding Chinese Hong Kong, Chinese Macao, and Chinese Taiwan) from 2012 to 2022, we measure their development levels using the entropy weight method and super-efficiency SBM model. A tri-system coupling coordination degree model (CCDM) is constructed to quantify their interactive relationships. Furthermore, spatial autocorrelation analysis (Moran's I) is employed to uncover their spatial aggregation characteristics. The findings reveal that: (1) The overall development levels of GI, EE, and DE have shown an upward but volatile trend, with significant regional imbalances. (2) The national coupling coordination degree has steadily increased from 0.385 (mild imbalance) in 2012 to 0.465 (on the verge of imbalance) in 2022, yet it remains at a low level with considerable room for improvement. (3) Spatially, the coordination level exhibits a distinct "ladder-like" distribution, descending from the eastern to the western regions. Global spatial autocorrelation is significantly positive, indicating a strong spatial agglomeration effect. Local spatial analysis identifies stable High-High (H-H) agglomerations in the eastern coastal provinces (e.g., Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong) and Low-Low (L-L) agglomerations in the northwestern regions (e.g., Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Xinjiang) since 2019. Based on these spatiotemporal evolution patterns, this study proposes targeted policy recommendations for categorized regional development to foster synergistic advancement and narrow regional disparities.
Green Innovation; Ecological Efficiency; Digital Economy; Coupling Coordination Degree; Spatial Autocorrelation; Regional Disparity
Fangyan Ma, Haiping Nong. Engineering Coupling Coordination and Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Green Innovation, Ecological Efficiency, and Digital Economy in China. Academic Journal of Business & Management (2025), Vol. 7, Issue 12: 109-117. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2025.071214.
[1] The State Council of the People's Republic of China. Report on the Work of the Government (2023). http://www.gov.cn.
[2] Li, H., Xiang, G., & Gao, Z. (2005). A Preliminary Study on the Institutional Conditions for the Transformation of Environmental Benefits from Green Innovation in Manufacturing into Enterprise Economic Benefits. Science Research Management, (2), 46-49.
[3] Wang, B., & Fang, C. (2010). Research on Regional Ecological Efficiency Based on Economic and Environmental Coordination. China Population, Resources and Environment, 20(3), 122-127.
[4] Han, J., et al. (2013). Research on China's Regional Green Innovation Efficiency. Finance Research, (11), 130-137.
[5] Cao, X., & Yu, J. (2015). Regional Differences and Convergence of Green Innovation Efficiency in China. R&D Management, 27(1), 23-32.
[6] Shen, N., & Zhou, J. (2018). Research on the Impact of Technological Heterogeneity and Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation Efficiency. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 39(5), 28-41.
[7] Yang, L., & Du, P. (2017). Evaluation of Urban Ecological Efficiency from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization Construction. Statistics and Decision, (18), 103-106.
[8] Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, H. (2020). Evaluation of Forestry Ecological Footprint, Ecological Pressure and Ecological Efficiency in China. Issues of Forestry Economics, 40(5), 510-517.
[9] Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 90-98.
[10] Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Measurement and Analysis of Eco-Efficiency: An Economist's Perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 15-18.
[11] China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT). (2022). White Paper on China's Digital Economy Development (2022).Beijing: CAICT Press.
[12] Cai, Y., & Niu, X. (2021). Scale Measurement and Structural Analysis of China's Digital Economy. Social Sciences in China, (11), 4-30.
[13] Cui, K., & Feng, X. (2020). Research on the Design of a Rural Digital Economy Indicator System from the Perspective of Digital Village Construction. Agricultural Modernization Research, 41(6), 899-909.