Ecological education has become increasingly important due to the rising ecological crises, among which language textbooks play a significant role. This study, based on the ecological transitivity system proposed by He, conducts an ecolinguistic analysis of nature discourse in Grade Seven English textbooks published by the People’s Education Press (PEP). The study aims to explore the images of nature presented in the textbooks and to uncover the underlying ecological awareness. The findings reveal the construction of five types of images of nature, namely nature as a source of human aesthetic pleasure, nature as an object of scientific inquiry, nature as an object of observation, personified nature, and nature as a victim, each conveying distinct ecological characteristics. The images of nature generally align with the ecological civilisation principles emphasised in contemporary Chinese environmental discourse; however, the distribution of different types also reveals a certain degree of anthropocentrism.

Yao Jia. The Presentation of Nature in Secondary School English Textbooks from an Ecolinguistic Perspective — A Case Study of the PEP Grade Seven English Textbooks. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2026), Vol. 8, Issue 1: 32-37. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2026.080106.

[1] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. English curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 edition). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. 2022

[2] Jacobs, G. M.; Goatly, A. The treatment of ecological issues in ELT coursebooks. English Language Teachers Journal, 2000; 54(3): 256-264.. DOI: 10.1093/elt/54.3.256

[3] Xiong, T. Shallow environmentalism: A preliminary eco-critical discourse analysis of secondary school English as a foreign language ( EFL) texts in China. The Journal of Environmental Education. 2014;45(4): 232-242. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.2014.943686

[4] Cristovão VL, Sanches B, Smart G. Environmental discourse in Brazilian English-as-a-foreign-language textbooks: socio-discursive practices and their implications for developing students’ critical environmental literacy. Environmental Education Research. 2022, 28(1):75-94. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2021.2007855

[5] Liu, Y, An, L., Chen, S. Environmental sustainability education in twelve series of Chinese university English language textbooks. SAGE Open. 2024; 14(3): 1-12. DOI: 10.1177/21582440241266829

[6] Jacobs, G. M., Teh, J. X., & Joyce, M. J. The presentation of animals in English as an additional language coursebooks. Language & Ecology. 2016; 1–9.

[7] Zahoor M, Janjua F. Green contents in English language textbooks in Pakistan: An ecolinguistic and ecopedagogical appraisal. British Educational Research Journal. 2020; 46(2): 321-338. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3579

[8] He, W., Gao, R., & Liu, J. New developments in ecological discourse analysis. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. 2021. 57-125

[9] He, W. Ecological discourse analysis: A further development of the Hallidayan model. Foreign Language Education. 2021; 42(1), 20–27. DOI:10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2021.01. 005.

[10] Huang, G., & Zhao, R. The origins, aims, principles, and methods of ecological discourse analysis. Modern Foreign Languages. 2017; 40(5), 585–596.

[11] Chu A, Ang L H, Halim H A. Systematic Literature Review of Ecological Discourse Analysis From 2014 to 2023. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2024; 14(11): 3431-3442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.12

[12] He, W., & Shen, W. Representations of animal discourse in language textbooks from an ecolinguistic perspective. Foreign Language Education. 2023; 44(4), 7–15. DOI:10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2023.04.008