Frontiers in Educational Research, 2022, 5(8); doi: 10.25236/FER.2022.050812.
Zhengyang Zhang, Ming Chen
Manchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
MOOC is becoming increasingly popular around the world. However, its status and effectiveness in higher education are still controversial. This study investigates Chinese postgraduate students' MOOC learning experiences (factors driving them to learn and future optimisation suggestions) on the Chinese University MOOC (iCourse) platform. By conducting semi-structured interviews with five Chinese graduate students, data was gathered. According to the findings, students choose to learn on MOOC because of its flexibility and their need for professional expertise. MOOC learning can be improved by providing more flexible courses, improving interactivity, and providing more assistance for learners. Future research could use larger samples to investigate students' learning accomplishments and the effectiveness of MOOC learning.
MOOC, Chinese University MOOC, Chinese postgraduate students
Zhengyang Zhang, Ming Chen. To MOOC or not to MOOC: An Empirical Study of Chinese Students’ MOOC Learning. Frontiers in Educational Research (2022) Vol. 5, Issue 8: 55-62. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.050812.
[1] Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., and Siemens, G. (2014) Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the mooc research initiative’. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954
[2] Yu, W. (2019) A research on foreign language learners’ motivation and learning strategies in moocs ——a case study of the chinese university mooc platform. MA. Central China Normal University.
[3] Wang, X., Hall, A. H., and Wang, Q. (2019) Investigating the implementation of accredited massive online open courses (moocs) in higher education: The boon and the bane’. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 3. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3896
[4] Liang, W. (2019) Comparative research on major mooc platforms in china from the perspective of learners and its enlightenment’. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.155
[5] Luo, Y., Zhou, G., Li, J., and Xiao, X. (2018) Study on mooc scoring algorithm based on chinese university mooc learning behavior data’. Heliyon, 4(11), 00960–00960. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2018.e00960
[6] Luo, Y., Zhou, G., and Li, J. (2018) “Comparing the chinese university mooc platform to the three major mooc players.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering (pp. 1–5) New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3207677.3277920
[7] Meng, Z. (2018) A review of mooc research in china - hot topics and trends. Software Guide (Educational Technology), 17(10), 26–29.
[8] Belanger, Y., and Thornton, J. (2013) “Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach.” Leadership and StratEDgy. Retrieved from https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/6216/Duke_ Bioelectricity_MOOC_Fall2012.pdf
[9] Zhang, Y. (2019) Research on the development strategy of MOOC platform based on scene value co-creation: Taking "MOOC of Chinese University" as an example’. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM (pp. 195–199) https://doi.org/10.2991/febm-19.2019.48
[10] Reich, J. (2014) Mooc completion and retention in the context of student intent: EDUCAUSE REVIEW. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent
[11] Zhou, J. (2017) Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online collaborative learning: An extended ecm perspective’. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2914
[12] El Said, G. R. (2017) Understanding how learners use massive open online courses and why they drop out’. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(5), 724–752. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0735633116681302
[13] Ma, L., and Lee, C. S. (2019) Understanding the barriers to the use of moocs in a developing country: An innovation resistance perspective’. Journal of educational computing research, 57(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118757732
[14] Reparaz, C., Aznárez-Sanado, M., and Mendoza, G. (2020) Self-regulation of learning and mooc retention’. Computers in human behavior, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106423
[15] Onah, D. F. O., Pang, E. L. L., Sinclair, J. E., and Uhomoibhi, J. (2021) An innovative mooc platform: The implications of self-directed learning abilities to improve motivation in learning and to support self-regulation’. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-03-2020-0040
[16] Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., and Mustain, P. (2016) Learning in moocs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in moocs’. The Internet and higher education, 29 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
[17] Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., and Schneider, E. (2013) “Deconstructing disengagement.” In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170–179) Leuven, Belgium: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
[18] Luik, P. (2019) What motivates enrolment in programming moocs?’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12600
[19] McMillan, J. H., and Forsyth, D. R. (1991) What theories of motivation say about why learners learn’. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 45, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914507
[20] Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., and Pintrich, P. R. (2008) Motivation in education : Theory, research, and applications. (J. L. Meece. 3rd / Dale H. Schunk Paul R. Pintrich, Ed.) (edn.) Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
[21] Milligan, C., and Littlejohn, A. (2017) Why study on a mooc? The motives of students and professionals. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033
[22] Ventista, O. M. (2018) Self-assessment in massive open online courses’. E-learning and digital media, 15(4), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018784950
[23] Wang, Y., and Baker, R. (2015) Content or platform: Why do students complete moocs?. Journal of online learning and teaching, 11(1), 17.
[24] Hew, K. F., and Cheung, W. S. (2014) Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10/tmb
[25] Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., and Ainley, M. (2016) The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130
[26] Zhou, M. (2016) Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective’. Computers and education, 92–93, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2015.10.012
[27] Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., and Carroll, J. M. (2015) ’Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 1882–1895)
[28] Deshpande, A., and Chukhlomin, V. (2017) What makes a good MOOC: A field study of factors impacting student motivation to learn’. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(4), 275–293.
[29] Guo, X., Wu, F., and Zheng, X. (2020) “What motives learner to learn in mooc? An investigation of chinese university mooc.” In 2019 International Joint Conference on Information, Media and Engineering (IJCIME. Osaka, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcime49369.2019.00039
[30] Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., and Schneider, E. (2015) Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in moocs: Participation in social networks outside of moocs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1111 /bjet.12297
[31] Antwi, S. K., and Hamza, K. (2015) Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection’. European journal of business and management, 7(3), 217–225.
[32] Runeson, P., and Höst, M. (2009) Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering’. Empirical software engineering : an international journal, 14(2), 131–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8
[33] Mason, J. (2002) Qualitative researching (2nd edn.) London: SAGE.
[34] Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10/fswdcx
[35] Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd edn.) Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.
[36] Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals’. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
[37] Salim, M. H. M., Mohamad, N., and Taha, M. (2019) Understanding students’ motivation and learning strategies to redesign massive open online courses based on persuasive system development’. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10. https://doi.org/ 10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0101233
[38] Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2013) Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE.