Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2023, 6(5); doi: 10.25236/AJHSS.2023.060502.

Effects of the Written Test Form and Content with Pragmatic Meaning in the Validity of English Speech Test

Author(s)

Jun Sun

Corresponding Author:
Jun Sun
Affiliation(s)

The Affiliated High School to Hangzhou Normal University, 5 Zhenhua Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Abstract

Many teacher-training universities only adopt a single form (read aloud) and content without pragmatic meaning in English Speech Test. However, some scholars show queries on this issue because they worry about whether a single form (read aloud) and content without pragmatic meaning bring about low validity or not. This essay focuses on effects of the written test form and content with pragmatic meaning in the validity of English Speech Test. And through the experiment and analysis, it can be seen that when the written test form and content with pragmatic meaning are added, it comparatively whether plays an important role in English Speech Test or not.

Keywords

Validity, The Written Test Form, Content with Pragmatic Meaning, A Single Form, Content without Pragmatic Meaning, English Speech Test

Cite This Paper

Jun Sun. Effects of the Written Test Form and Content with Pragmatic Meaning in the Validity of English Speech Test. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 5: 7-10. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.060502.

References

[1] Jenkins J. (1998). Which Pronunciation Norms and Models for English as an International Language? [J]. ELT Journal, 175-205.

[2] Yunxiang Su. (1999). Language Testing Theories and Methods [M]. Shanghai: World Publishing Corporation.

[3] Yuhong Yang. (2001). On the Effectiveness of English Pronunciation Testing [J]. Journal of Suzhou Railway Teachers College (Social Science), 11, 5627–5633

[4] Mc Nernery M. & Mendelsohn D. (1992). Suprasegmentals in the Pronunciation Class: Setting Priorities [A] and Teaching American Pronunciation [M]. Education, 28, 221–243. doi: 10. 1023/ B% 3AMOEM. 0000040153.26156. ed

[5] Hughes A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 893–897. doi:10.1033/0022-006X.56.6.893

[6] Clennell C. (1997). Raising the Pedagogic Status of Discourse Intonation Teaching [J]. ELT Journal, 239-258.

[7] Xiaohong Du. (1999). The analysis of English Speech Test in College [J]. Teaching research: 2001: 125-131.

[8] Hughes A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 893–897. doi:10.1033/0022-006X.56.6.893

[9] Bradford B. (1988). Intonation in Context: Intonation Practice for Upper-Intermediate and Advanced Learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press