Yun Wang, Wenyu Liu
Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China
Based on the proposal and development of artificial emotion theory, and driven by practical needs, artificial intelligence emotion simulation technology attempts to impart emotion to artificial intelligence by simulating the induction and expression functions of emotion. The emotion simulation technology of artificial intelligence is of great significance. It is not only conducive to the further development of artificial intelligence itself, but also conducive to the formation of a good human-computer interaction relationship, and it is also conducive to continuously deepening human beings' understanding of themselves. Science and technology are a double-edged sword. It is necessary to conduct an ethical reflection on artificial intelligence emotional simulation, and continuously deepen the understanding of artificial intelligence emotional simulation technology. After reflection, it is found that there are some ethical risks in the process of artificial intelligence emotional simulation, including the strengthening of instrumental rationality by computational thinking, the lack of emotional subject and the loss of value, and the deceptive intention contained in emotional simulation.
artificial emotion; affective computing; human-computer interaction; ethical reflection
Yun Wang, Wenyu Liu. Emotional Simulation of Artificial Intelligence and Its Ethical Reflection. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 5: 11-15. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.060503.
 M. Minsky, The Society of Mind, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, 1985.
 Wang Guojiang, Wang Zhiliang, Yang Guoliang, etc. A review of artificial emotion research [J]. Computer Application Research, 2006, 23(11): 7-11.
 Saldien J, Goris K, Vanderborght B, et al. Expressing emotions with the social robot probo[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2010, 2(4): 377-389.
 Leu F Y, Liu J, Hsu Y T, et al. The simulation of an emotional robot implemented with fuzzy logic[J]. Soft Computing, 2014, 18(9): 1729-1743.
 Klein B, Gaedt L, Cook G. Principles and experiences with Paro in Denmark, Germany, and the UK [J]. GeroPsych: Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26 (2), 2013: 89-99.
 Shao M, Snyder M, Nejat G, et al. User affect elicitation with a socially emotional robot[J]. Robotics, 2020, 9(2): 44.
 Nie Zhi, Sun Ya. Intelligent communication: Reconstruction of the relationship between instrumental rationality and value rationality [J]. Young Reporter, 2020(23): 10-11.
 Kubinyi E, Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á. Can you kill a robot nanny?: Ethological approach to the effect of robot caregivers on child development and human evolution[J]. Interaction Studies, 2010, 11(2): 214-219.
 Parks J A. Lifting the burden of Women's care work: should robots replace the “human touch”? [J]. Hypatia, 2010, 25(1): 100-120 .
 Bertolini A, Arian S. 3 Do robots care?[M]//Aging between Participation and Simulation. De Gruyter, 2020: 35-52.
 Coeckelbergh M. Are emotional robots deceptive?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2011, 3(4): 388-393.