As the priority direction of modern university research activities, research management is an important factor that directly affects the ability to stimulate the potential of university research activities and improve its competitiveness in the field of education. Therefore, modern universities must implement advanced scientific research management concepts, innovate, optimize and improve the contents and methods of scientific research management, improve the scientific research management system, provide high-quality services for scientific researchers, and meet the needs of scientific research success. This paper will analyze and study the case analysis and data collection of the innovation and development of university scientific research management, combined with the effectiveness of the case analysis strategy. The results show that the strategy has good effect in scientific research management and has broad application prospects.

Hui Lei. The strategy of implementing effective scientific research management system in colleges using DEA method under the analysis of multiple cases. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 8: 104-110. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2023.050819.

[1] Pahl-Wostl C., Knieper C., Lukat E., Meergans F., Schoderer M., Schütze N., & Vidaurre R. (2020). Enhancing the capacity of water governance to deal with complex management challenges: A framework of analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 23-35.

[2] Raza S. A., Qazi W., Khan K. A., & Salam J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208.

[3] Yanmin Xu, Yitao Tao, Chunjiong Zhang, Mingxing Xie, Wengang Li, Jianjiang Tai, "Review of Digital Economy Research in China: A Framework Analysis Based on Bibliometrics", Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2022, Article ID 2427034, 11 pages, 2022. 

[4] Guangul F. M., Suhail A. H., Khalit M. I., & Khidhir B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: a case study of Middle East College. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 32(4), 519-535.

[5] Lu R., Hong S. H., & Yu M. (2019). Demand response for home energy management using reinforcement learning and artificial neural network. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(6), 6629-6639.

[6] Liu J., Liu Y., & Wang X. (2020). An environmental assessment model of construction and demolition waste based on system dynamics: a case study in Guangzhou. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(30), 37237-37259.

[7] Octaberlina L. R., & Muslimin A. I. (2020). EFL students perspective towards online learning barriers and alternatives using Moodle/Google Classroom during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 1-9.

[8] Marachi R., & Quill L. (2020). The case of Canvas: Longitudinal datafication through learning management systems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 418-434.

[9] Morisson A., & Doussineau M. (2019). Regional innovation governance and place-based policies: design, implementation and implications. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6(1), 101-116.

[10] Correani A., De Massis A., Frattini  F., Petruzzelli A. M., & Natalicchio A. (2020). Implementing a digital strategy: Learning from the experience of three digital transformation projects. California Management Review, 62(4), 37-56.

[11] Capano G. (2020). Policy design and state capacity in the COVID-19 emergency in Italy: if you are not prepared for the (un) expected, you can be only what you already are. Policy and Society, 39(3), 326-344.

[12] Castro R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523-2546.

[13] Aizawa I., & Rose H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’s English as medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: the gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77(6), 1125-1142.

[14] El Gibari S., Gómez T., & Ruiz F. (2019). Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: A review. Journal of Business Economics, 89(1), 1-24.