Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2023, 6(14); doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.061422.

Construction of Curriculum Assessment and Evaluation System for International Trade Majors in Higher Vocational Education


Lulu Yu, Chenlin Wang

Corresponding Author:
Lulu Yu

Jinan Engineering Polytechnic, Jinan, Shandong, China


With the development of the times, the evaluation of international trade courses has become an important part of teaching activities, because course evaluation can help students understand their learning process, and enable them to better learn knowledge and master the skills of international trade. At present, professional courses in vocational colleges still adopt the traditional evaluation model, with the purpose of assessing knowledge, which cannot accurately understand students' learning level. So this article focuses on the construction of an assessment and evaluation system for international trade courses in vocational colleges, aiming to more accurately evaluate students' learning level by constructing an assessment and evaluation system. This article tested the accuracy improvement of student level evaluation using vocational international trade courses through experiments, and found that the accuracy increased by a minimum of 10% and a maximum of 20%. This indicates that the assessment and evaluation system for international trade courses in vocational colleges can indeed achieve good results.


Assessment and Evaluation, Evaluation System, International Trade, Vocational Courses

Cite This Paper

Lulu Yu, Chenlin Wang. Construction of Curriculum Assessment and Evaluation System for International Trade Majors in Higher Vocational Education. Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 14: 136-142. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.061422.


[1] Chiu P S, Pu Y H, Kao C C. An authentic learning based evaluation method for mobile learning in Higher Education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2018, 55(3): 336-347.

[2] Aixia W, Ying Z, Wijaya T T. The current situation and prospect of study quality evaluation research in china in the last 10 years. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2020, 2(1): 101-112.

[3] Tuononen T, Parpala A, Lindblom-Ylänne S. Graduates’ evaluations of usefulness of university education, and early career success–a longitudinal study of the transition to working life. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019, 44(4): 581-595.

[4] Aithal P S, Aithal S. Analysis of higher education in Indian National education policy proposal 2019 and its implementation challenges. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 2019, 3(2): 1-35.

[5] Bolli T, Caves K M, Renold U. Beyond employer engagement: measuring education-employment linkage in vocational education and training programmes. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 2018, 70(4): 524-563.

[6] Jabarullah N H, Iqbal Hussain H. The effectiveness of problem-based learning in technical and vocational education in Malaysia. Education+ Training, 2019, 61(5): 552-567.

[7] Gallardo K. Competency-based assessment and the use of performance-based evaluation rubrics in higher education: Challenges towards the next decade. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 2020, 78(1): 61-79.

[8] Liu Y, Raker J R, Lewis J E. Evaluating student motivation in organic chemistry courses: moving from a lecture-based to a flipped approach with peer-led team learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2018, 19(1): 251-264.

[9] White-Lewis D K. The facade of fit in faculty search processes. The Journal of Higher Education, 2020, 91(6): 833-857.

[10] Radosavljevic S, Radosavljevic V, Grgurovic B. The potential of implementing augmented reality into vocational higher education through mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 2020, 28(4): 404-418.

[11] Camilleri M A. Evaluating service quality and performance of higher education institutions: a systematic review and a post-COVID-19 outlook. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2021, 13(2): 268-281.

[12] Kireev B, Zhundibayeva A, Aktanova A. Distance learning in higher education institutions: Results of an experiment. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 2019, 10(3): 387-403.

[13] Hidayat H, Tamin B Y, Herawati S. The contribution of technopreneurship scientific learning and learning readiness towards the entrepreneurship learning outcomes in higher vocational education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 2019, 9(1): 21-32.

[14] Tentama F, Abdillah M H. Student Employability Examined from Academic Achievement and Self-Concept. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 2019, 8(2): 243-248.

[15] Perry J C, Wallace E W, McCormick M P. Making my future work: Evaluation of a new college and career readiness curriculum. Youth & Society, 2018, 50(6): 841-866.

[16] Lizunkov V, Politsinskaya E, Gazin K. The architecture of project-based learning in the supplementary vocational education system in a higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 2020, 15(4): 227-234.

[17] Smith P H. Enhancement and constraint: Student-mothers’ experiences of higher vocational education, emotion and time. Cambridge Journal of Education, 2019, 49(2): 163-179.

[18] Raji B. Significance and challenges of computer assisted education programs in the UAE: A case study of higher learning and vocational education. Education and Information Technologies, 2019, 24(1): 153-164.

[19] Zulaikha Z F, Hariri H, Rini R. Analysis of vocational education curriculum in ASEAN Economic Community: a literature review. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2021, 1(3): 157-170.

[20] Li J, Wiemann K, Shi W. Vocational education and training in Chinese and German companies in China: a ‘home international’ comparison. International Journal of Training and Development, 2019, 23(2): 153-168.