Frontiers in Educational Research, 2023, 6(17); doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.061721.
Yilin Bei1, Jingwei Zhou2, Xiujuan Sun1, Lichao Tian3
1Information and Science Technology Department, Taishan University, Tai'an, 271000, Shandong, China
2Network and Education Technology Center, Taishan University, Tai'an, 271000, Shandong, China
3School of Economics and Management, Taishan University, Tai’an, 271000, Shandong, China
In order to cultivate applied talents serving regional economic development as the goal, local undergraduate universities must empower first-class undergraduate education with first-class curriculum construction. Taking programming courses as an example, this article proposes a "student centered" hybrid teaching implementation plan. Starting from the three dimensions of pre class, during class, and after class, this article discusses the five-stage teaching method of "online resource and teaching platform selection, teaching content and organization adjustment, exercise testing and homework design, integration of ideological and political elements into teaching, assessment and evaluation, and teaching feedback", and finally explains the teaching and learning effect.
Programming Courses, Online and Offline Hybrid Teaching, Student Centered
Yilin Bei, Jingwei Zhou, Xiujuan Sun, Lichao Tian. Research on the Teaching Model Based on "MOOC+ Flipped Classroom" with the Concept of "Student Centered, Output Oriented". Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 17: 135-140. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.061721.
[1] Jiang Yunxia, Ge Xin, Wang Shuang. Research on Curriculum Teaching Organization Method Based on the Concept of "Golden Course". Journal of Higher Education, 2021(11): 157-160.
[2] Zhao Juming. Focusing on Learning Effectiveness: A Review of Evaluation Methods for Curriculum Teaching in American Universities - Part Six of the "Student Centered" Undergraduate Teaching Reform in the United States. Research on Higher Engineering Education, 2019(6): 9-23.
[3] Zhu Shiming. Deep Integration of Intelligent Technology in Gold Course Construction: Framework and Path. Research Trends in Higher Education Teaching in China, 2020, 30(8): 34-40.
[4] He Li, Wang Xiao. Exploring the evaluation of learning effectiveness of mixed online and offline first-class courses on data structure. Computer Education 2022 (9): 119-123.
[5] Su Xiaohong, Zhao Lingling, Ye Lin, etc. Exploration and Practice of Mixed Teaching Based on MOOC+SPOC. China University Teaching, 2015(7):60-65.
[6] Carter, Rita., et al. The Human Brain Book: An Illustrated Guide to Its Structure, Function, and Disorders. (Revided Edition). New York: DK. 2019. 1~264.
[7] Cennamo, K., & Kalk, D. Real World Instructional Design: An Iterative Approach to Designing Learning Experiences. New York: Routledge. 2019. 1~386.
[8] Wixted, John T. (Editor-in-chief). Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuoscience: Volume 1 Learning and memory. (Forth Edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2018. 1~614.
[9] Weimer, Maryellen. Active Learning: A Practical Guide for College Faculty. Madison: Magna Publications, 2017. 1~137.
[10] Marrett, Cora Bagley et al. How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2018. 1~346.
[11] Kuh, George D. et al. Using Evidence of Student Learning to Improve Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2015. 1~275.
[12] Branch, Robert Maribe. “Characteristics of Foundational Instructional Design Models”. In Reiser, Robert A. & Dempsey, John V. (Eds.) Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. (Fourth Edition). New York: Pearson Education, 2018. 23~30.
[13] Banta, Trudy W., and Palomba, Catherine A. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. (Second Edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2015. 1~339.
[14] Gluck, Mark A., Mercado, Eduardo, & Myers, Catherine E. Learning and Memory: From Brain to Behavior. (Third Edition). New York: Worth Publishers, 2016. 1~516.
[15] Reiser, Robert A., & Dempsey, John V. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. (Fourth Edition). New York: Pearson Education, 2018. 1~358.