Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, 2023, 6(9); doi: 10.25236/AJETS.2023.060901.

A Comparative Study of Video Coding Standards for 8K Ultra-High-Definition Video: HEVC vs. AV1

Author(s)

Yiming Yuan, Jingya Zhu, Rao Fu

Corresponding Author:
Yiming Yuan
Affiliation(s)

Yanching Institute of Technology, Beijing, China

Abstract

This paper compares HEVC and AV1, two video coding standards, for 8K ultra-high-definition video based on four aspects: bitrate, quality, complexity, and compatibility. Using five objective metrics and eight video sequences, the paper shows that AV1 generally outperforms HEVC in bitrate and quality, but also has higher complexity and lower compatibility. The paper discusses the findings and implications of the study, compares them with the existing literature, and provides some suggestions for future research or practice on 8K video coding.

Keywords

HEVC, AV1, 8K video coding, bitrate, quality, complexity, compatibility

Cite This Paper

Yiming Yuan, Jingya Zhu, Rao Fu. A Comparative Study of Video Coding Standards for 8K Ultra-High-Definition Video: HEVC vs. AV1. Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 9: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJETS.2023.060901.

References

[1] Gao, W., Yuan, H., Liao, G., Guo, Z., & Gao, J. (2023). PP8K: A New Dataset for 8K UHD Video Compression and Processing. IEEE MultiMedia. 

[2] Cheon, M., & Lee, J. S. (2017). Subjective and objective quality assessment of compressed 4K UHD videos for immersive experience. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 28(7), 1467-1480.

[3] Sullivan, G. J., Ohm, J. R., Han, W. J., & Wiegand, T. (2012). Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 22(12), 1649-1668.

[4] Zhang, Y., Zhu, L., Jiang, G., Kwong, S., & Kuo, C. C. J. (2023). A survey on perceptually optimized video coding. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1-37.

[5] Murthy, S. V. N., & Sujatha, B. K. (2016). Multi-level optimization in encoding to balance video compression and retention of 8K resolution. Perspectives in Science, 8, 338-344.

[6] Bossen, F. (2013). Common test conditions and software reference configurations. JCTVC-L1100, 12(7). 

[7] Hanhart, P., Rerabek, M., De Simone, F., & Ebrahimi, T. (2014). Subjective quality evaluation of the upcoming HEVC video compression standard. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 32, 30-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2014.07.002

[8] Bross, B. (2013). High efficiency video coding (HEVC) text specification draft 10 (for FDIS & Last Call). In Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 12th Meeting, Geneva (Jan. 2013).

[9] de Oliveira Bristot, V. J., de Bem Alves, A. C., Cardoso, L. R., da Luz Scheffer, D., & Aguiar Jr, A. S. (2019). The role of PGC-1α/UCP2 signaling in the beneficial effects of physical exercise on the brain. Frontiers in neuroscience, 13, 292.

[10] Polak, L., Kufa, J., & Kratochvil, T. (2020, October). On the Compression Performance of HEVC, VP9 and AV1 Encoders for Virtual Reality Videos. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.