With the acceleration of new urbanization construction, the contradiction between urbanization construction and ecological environment protection has become increasingly prominent, which directly affects regional coordinated development. The coupling system between urbanization and ecological environment is an important part of the regional system of human land relations. In the face of global scale remote connections, spatiotemporal compression, and socio-economic reconstruction in the new era, traditional research frameworks urgently need to be transformed and upgraded. Drawing on theories such as the regional system of human land relations, remote coupling, and planetary urbanization, starting from the perspective of complexity science, this paper first analyzes the connotation of the coupling system between urbanization and ecological environment. Then, from four dimensions of space, time, representation, and organization, an analytical framework is proposed to explain the coupling mechanism between urbanization and ecological environment - the "Coupling Cube (CHNC)", which discusses its concept, connotation Evolutionary law and analytical framework: the system and system, system and elements, and elements and elements in the Rubik's Cube are interconnected and interact through various "coupling lines" to form an organic whole nested, interconnected, and Unity of opposites; The rotation of the Rubik's Cube represents the spatiotemporal nonlinear coupling effect between urbanization and ecological environment in different regions.

Dawei Qi. Research on Coupled and Coordinated Development of New Urbanization and Ecological Environment. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 16: 61-68. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.061609.

[1] Grossman G M, Krueger A. Economic growth and the environment [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995(110):253-377. 

[2] Berger A R, Hodge R A. Natural change in the environment: a challenge to the pressure-state-response concept [J]. Social Indicators Research, 1998, 44(2):255- 265. 

[3] Tian Yipeng, Miao Yanyi. "Absorption" and "Production": Practical Logic of Pluralistic Governance at Grass-roots Level [J]. Journal of Nantong University (Social Science Edition), 2020 (01): 82-88. 

[4] Zhou Li'an. Administrative contract system [J]. Society, 2014 (06): 1-38. 

[5] Zhang Haizhu, Chen Xiaoyu, Yuan Huiyun. General Characteristics and Motivation of Local Social Governance Innovation in China--Multi-case Text Analysis Based on Typical Cases of Innovative Social Governance (2012-2021) [J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Science Edition), 2022 (01): 62-73. 

[6] He Degui and Liu Xian. Potential energy of party building: the practical mechanism of grass-roots party building leading the development of rural industry--Taking the "triple" of party building in H County, Shaanxi Province as an example [J]. Journal of Party School of Tianjin Municipal Committee of CPC, 2022 (02): 12-23. 

[7] Xu Yong. Seeking "governance" in the practice of governance innovation [J]. Executive Forum, 2022 (02): 5-9. 

[8] Xu Qin. Institutional suspension: an explanatory framework for the deviation of innovation path of rural social governance [J]. Local Governance Research, 2022 (01): 65-77. 

[9] Deng Dacai. Types of governance: from "good order" to "good governance"-taking rural society as the research object [J]. Social Science Front, 2018 (09): 177-184. 

[10] Luo Xiaojun, Yao Xiuli. Four archway communities promote the construction of "three governance" and build a beautiful home [N]. Jiaxing Daily, October 27, 2015 (06). 

[11] Zhang Panli, Jiang Fan. Three governance in one: Tongxiang walks out of the new path of good governance in county [N]. Zhejiang Daily, July 8, 2015 (12). 

[12] He Zukun. Pay attention to the government response [J]. China Administration, 2000 (07): 7-8.