Changing the "knowledge classroom" into a "competence classroom" and getting rid of the traditional "duck-filling" teaching is a top priority for the development of higher education in China. Classroom teaching reform not only needs to respect the traditional teaching methods on the basis of exploring the development of a new road, but also actively strive for public recognition, the formation of reform synergy. By correcting the possible shortcomings of the reform path, we can significantly stimulate students' usual learning initiatives, improve their daily learning efficiency, ensure that classroom teaching is student-centred and focused on students' own development, and effectively improve the scientific and rational nature of the classroom. It is imperative that classroom teaching reform should actively face the real-life problems faced by classroom teaching reform and find strategies and ways to reform classroom teaching. With reference to the development trends of education and teaching at home and abroad in the past two decades and relevant literature, this paper will analyse the scientificity, rationality and necessity of classroom teaching reform from three aspects: analysis of the current situation of university classroom teaching, the practical problems faced in implementing classroom teaching reform, and the strategies and ways to implement classroom teaching reform.

Li Haixia, Wang Jinglei. Transforming the Curriculum into the Classroom - An Inquiry into Classroom Instructional Change. Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 19: 77-82. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.061914.

[1] Black P. Dylan W. In Praise of Educational Research ': Formative Assessment [J]. British Educational Research Journal, 2023,29(5).

[2] Zhai Bo. Establishing a scientific view of balanced development of education [J]. Education Research 2018 (1). 

[3] Lu Guodong. Reflections on some elements in university teaching [J]. Chinese University Teaching, 2019(11):11-13. 

[4] Zhou Jianxiong, Su Hui, Shi Zhiguang. A study on the use of discussion-based teaching methods in university classrooms [J]. Journal of Higher Education Research, 2022, 31(4): 55 

[5] MICHELE M. Teaching at Stanford: an introductory handbook [M]. Denver: The center for teaching and learning, Stanford University, 2017: 29-32. 

[6] James M. Assessment, Teaching and Theories of Learning [A]. In John Gardner (ed.) Assessment and Learning [C], London: Sage publications .2016.

[7] Clarke S. Unlocking Formative Assessment (New Zealand edition) [MJ. Auckland: Hodder Education, 2003; http://cms.curriculum.edu.au/assessment/default.au/assessment/default.asp; http://www.aac .ab .ca /aboutqa.html]; 

[8] Li Chong, Su Yongjian, Ma Yongchi. Practical exploration of improving and perfecting students' evaluation system in higher education [J]. Modern Education Management, 2017, (12): 69

[9] Black P, Harrison C. Lee C. Marshall B. Dylan W. Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom [J]. Phi Delta Kappan 2022(9). 

[10] Zhang Dewei. The principle of integration of teaching and assessment in Japanese primary and secondary schools and its implications for China [ J ], Foreign Educational Research, 2023,(2). 

[11] Assessment Reform Group (ARG). Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box [DB OL]. http://www. qea.org.uk/library Assets/media beyond_black _box2. pdf.2019. 

[12] Hargreaves A, Earl L. Perspectives on Alternative Assessment Reform [J]. American Educational Research Journal, 2002.39(1);