Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2023, 6(19); doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.061920.

Research on the Cultivation of High School Students' High Order Thinking Ability Based on the Theory of Performance Evaluation

Author(s)

Qi Tengda

Corresponding Author:
Qi Tengda
Affiliation(s)

College of Arts, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, 100091

Abstract

High order thinking abilities in Chinese language for high school students include analysis, evaluation, and creativity, which possess intrinsic and non-visual characteristics. Performance evaluation can visualize thinking through performance tasks and scoring criteria, accurately evaluate and enhance students' high order thinking abilities in Chinese language based on their performance. When evaluating and cultivating high school students' high order thinking abilities in Chinese language using performance evaluation, teachers need to establish clear performance objectives, design performance tasks that align with students' high order thinking, and make the performance evaluation rules transparent to students, encouraging their participation in the development of evaluation criteria.

Keywords

Performance evaluation, high school Chinese language, core literacy, high order thinking ability, evaluation

Cite This Paper

Qi Tengda. Research on the Cultivation of High School Students' High Order Thinking Ability Based on the Theory of Performance Evaluation. Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 19: 112-118. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.061920.

References

[1] Ding Wenjing, Wei Dongyu.(2016). On the meaning, characteristics and training strategies of Chinese core literacy -- Based on the analysis of research teaching mode theory [J]. modern Chinese, (6): p.81

[2] Zhao Fulou(2016). Core literacy: the starting point and destination of modern Chinese reconstruction [J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University,(10):p. 27

[3] Luo Xiaohui(2016). Core literacy of Chinese and Chinese teaching [J]. Education Science Forum, (20): pp.32-35

[4] Zhong Qiquan(2016). Curriculum development based on core literacy: challenges and topics [J]. global education outlook, (1): p.5

[5] L.w. Anderson(2007). Taxonomy of learning, teaching and evaluation -- Bloom's taxonomy of educational goals revised edition [M]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press,p.75

[6] Stiggins,r.j(1987).designed development of performance assessment[J].educational measurement: issues and practice,6 (6):pp.199-201.

[7] Pophom w J(2003). promoting classroom evaluation of teaching [M]. translated by the project team of "Evaluation Research on promoting teacher development and student growth" of national basic education curriculum reform. Beijing: China Light Industry Press,p.137.

[8] Hart, D(2004). authenticity evaluation: teacher guidance manual [M]. translated by the project team of "Evaluation Research on promoting teacher development and student growth" in the national basic education curriculum reform. Beijing: China Light Industry Press,p.4

[9] Zhang Yongmei, Meng Qingmao(2003). Assessment of academic achievement under the new curriculum: concepts and methods [J]. global education outlook, (11):pp. 34-37

[10] Tanaka, Kenji Matsushita, the challenge of learning evaluation: the application of performance evaluation in schools [M]. translated by zhengguxin. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2015:63