Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2023, 6(24); doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.062411.

A Research on College Students’ Engagement in English Writing Course

Author(s)

Suli Liu

Corresponding Author:
Suli Liu
Affiliation(s)

School of English Language, Culture and Literature, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing, 100024, China

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive study on college students’ engagement in a blended mode English writing course. Paper questionnaires and SPSS 26.0 were used to analyze the results. 61 sophomores of non-English majors participated this research. It has been found that students actively took part in the blended mode learning and the students were more motivated and confident in future English learning and less anxious after the course. We also found that the majority of student’s engagement, namely, behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, and agentic engagement corelate with their learning results. While the relationship between cognitive engagement and mid-term and final testing was not significant enough. The research findings indicate the importance of raising the awareness of students’ engagement in English writing course. With the results of this investigation, the current study provides some suggestions for English writing course design, as well.

Keywords

engagement; English writing course; blended mode learning

Cite This Paper

Suli Liu. A Research on College Students’ Engagement in English Writing Course. Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 24: 64-70. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.062411.

References

[1] Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25(4), 297–308.

[2] Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180. 

[3] Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.

[4] Fredricks, J. A., & Mc Colskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763-782). Boston, MA: Springer US.

[5] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

[6] Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

[7] Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences. An Account of the Development and Use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. University of California, Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education.

[8] Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Boston, MA: Springer US.

[9] Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150-161.

[10] Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 242–258.

[11] Tyler, R. W. (1932). Measuring the results of college instruction. Educational Research Bulletin, 11(10), 253-260.