In recent years, the parallel trend of Internet celebrity cities and popular culture has created the phenomenon of urban homogenization. In this process, universal modernist techniques have eroded a large amount of local space and local construction concepts. Local culture has not been dynamically inherited, but has been deconstructed into the system of global capital operation. Aiming at this phenomenon, how to appropriately push the relationship between local perception and urban environmental education has become a key issue that needs urgent consideration. Through qualitative theory sorting-out, case sample dismantling, and element analysis, the article systematically sets up the connection between education concepts, space differences, research methods, and local construction of urban construction and local identity, and puts forward corresponding training method for the shaping of local perception in urban environmental education, also proposes five logical perspectives from “concept-perception-practice”. This article fills in the construction of systematic framework of local perception theory from the perspective of urban environmental education with the expectation of deeply thinking about the radical treatment and the involvement of humanized concept through the objective linkage between urban planners, educators, and learners.

Huang Yuhao, Li Mingjun. Rethinking the shaping of place sense in urban environmental education. Frontiers in Art Research (2023) Vol. 5, Issue 15: 64-71. https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.2023.051510.

[1] Kudryavtsev, A, Krasny, etal. The impact of environmental education on sense of place among urban youth[J]. Ecosphere, 2010(4):29-34. 

[2] Kudryavtsev, A, Stedman, etal. Sense of place in environmental education[J]. Environmental education research, 2012, 18(2):229-250. 

[3] Adams, JD. Theorizing a sense of place in transnational community[J]. Children, youth and environments, 2013, 23(3):43-65.

[4] Yi-Fu Tuan. Space and place: an empirical perspective [M]. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2017.

[5] Yifu Tuan. Topophilia: a study of environmental perceptions, attitudes, and values [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2019.

[6] Julien. Between mountains and waters: the unthinking of life and ideals [M]. Shanghai:East China Normal University Press, 2017.

[7] Edward Relf. Place and non-place [M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2022.

[8] Tzou, Bell C A, P. The role of borders in environmental education: Positioning, power and marginality.[J]. Ethnography and Education, 2012, 7(2):265-282.

[9] Gruenewald, DA. Accountability and collaboration: Institutional barriers and strategic pathways for place-based education.[J]. Ethics, Place and Environment, 2015, 8(3):261-283.

[10] Thomashow, M. Bringing the biosphere home: Learning to perceive global environmental change [M]. Cambridge: Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2002: 34-44. 

[11] Roland Barthes. The empire of symbols [M]. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2018: 33-64.

[12] Bellino, Adams M A, JD. Reimagining environmental education: Urban youths’ perceptions and investigations of their communities[J]. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação de Ciências, 2014, 14(2):27-38.

[13] Wattchow, Brown B A, M. A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world [M]. Monash, Australia: Monash University Publishing, 2011: 23-26.

[14] Pan, Yiyang, Cobbinah A P B. "Embedding place attachment: Residents’ lived experiences of urban regeneration in Zhuanghe, China."[J]. Habitat International, 2023, 135(1):102796. 

[15] Yao Yuanwei and Huang Yuhao. Inheritance and renewal: a study on in situ design of ribbon landscape space based on industrial heritage [J]. Zhejiang Garden, 2023(2):25-30.

[16] Huang Yuhao. On the Return Journey to the Picturesqueness [J]. Arts Studies and Criticism, 2022(2): 47-49.