Welcome to Francis Academic Press

Frontiers in Educational Research, 2023, 6(26); doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.062617.

Research on the thinking path of physical education courses in higher education institutions based on the model of competitive education

Author(s)

Xiao Menglong1, Zhao Qianjie2, Su Caping2

Corresponding Author:
Xiao Menglong
Affiliation(s)

1Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, 526060, China

2Guangdong Vocational and Technical University of Business and Technology, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, 526060, China

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on innovation in thinking about the table tennis curriculum based on the context of the competitive education model. The study aims to explore the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating the competitive education model into the table tennis curriculum and to examine its potential impact on student learning and development. The study used a qualitative research approach, utilizing a literature review and case studies to assess the effectiveness of the model. Findings suggest that the competitive education model can enhance the table tennis curriculum, improve students' physical and mental fitness, and promote healthy competition. This paper concludes that incorporating a competitive education model into the table tennis curriculum has the potential to be an effective way to promote student learning and development.

Keywords

competitive education, physical education curriculum, innovation, higher education

Cite This Paper

Xiao Menglong, Zhao Qianjie, Su Caping. Research on the thinking path of physical education courses in higher education institutions based on the model of competitive education. Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 26: 101-105. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.062617.

References

[1] Jin Hongbao, Li Bo. Theoretical considerations on the introduction of competitive education into secondary school physical education[J]. Teaching and Management,2011, 11(36):126-127. 

[2] Jin Yule, Zhang Liang. The development of curriculum theory and its impact since the new curriculum reform in China[J]. China Education Science (in English and Chinese),2019, 02(05):77-87. 

[3] Ji Liu et al. Psychology of physical education [M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press,2010.74-75.

[4] Wang Xuefeng. Thinking about physical education and athletics in pedagogical perspective[J]. Journal of Physical Education, 2007, 07(09 ):15-19.

[5] Cheng Yanmei. Reflections on the reform of current school physical education and track and field teaching - the idea of introducing the model of athletic education [J]. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2010,12(S2):193-195.

[6] Xiong Qiang. The construction and experimental research on the movement education model of physical education professional practice course[J]. Educational Academic Monthly,2012, 12(10): 51-53.

[7] Li Jiantao. The study of sports education model in high school table tennis option teaching[J]. Sports Science and Technology Literature Bulletin,2019, 27(06):82-84.

[8] Gao Hang, Gao Rong. On the value and development of the era of sports education model[J]. Journal of Physical Culture,2020, 20(01):105-110.

[9] McLennan, N., & Thompson, J. Quality physical education (QPE): Guidelines for policy makers. Unesco Publishing.2015, 02(11):15-36.

[10] Pickett, A. C., & Cunningham, G. B. Physical activity for every body: A model for managing weight stigma and creating body-inclusive spaces. Quest, 2017, 69(1), 19-36.

[11] Bailey, R. Sport, physical education and educational worth. Educational Review, 2018, 70(1), 51-66.

[12] Corbin, C. B., Kulinna, P. H., & Sibley, B. A. A dozen reasons for including conceptual physical education in quality secondary school programs. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2020, 91(3), 40-49.

[13] Wang C, Dev R D O, Soh K G, et al. Effects of blended learning in physical education among university students: a systematic review[J]. Education Sciences, 2022, 12(8): 530. 

[14] Navarro-Patón, R. News of the Pedagogical Models in Physical Education—A Quick Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(3), 25-86.

[15] Koh, K. T., Camiré, M., Lim Regina, S. H., & Soon, W. S. Implementation of a values training program in physical education and sport: a follow-up study. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2017, 22(2), 197-211.

[16] Escartí, A., Gutiérrez, M., Pascual, C., & Llopis, R. Implementation of the personal and social responsibility model to improve self-efficacy during physical education classes for primary school children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 2010, 10(3), 387-402.

[17] Cervantes, C. M., & Meaney, K. S. Examining service-learning literature in physical education teacher education: Recommendations for practice and research. Quest, 2013, 65(3), 332-353.

[18] Fischer-Tiné, H. Fitness for Modernity? The YMCA and physical-education schemes in late-colonial South Asia (circa 1900–40). Modern Asian Studies, 209, 53(2), 512-559.

[19] Li Xiaowei. The application of competitive education model in high school physical education optional course [J]. Chizi, 2014 (24):276. 

[20] Feng He. Research on the Necessity of Setting up the Course of Youth Athletic Pedagogy [D].  Jilin Institute of Physical Education, 2013. 

[21] Gao Shuai. Jilin Province sports school competitive education theory analysis and countermeasure research [D]. Jilin Institute of Physical Education, 2013. 

[22] Zhao Yuxuan. Experimental Research on the Application of Competitive Education Model in PE Elective Courses in Senior High School [D]. Hebei Normal University, 2013. 

[23] Zou Yuling. On Subjective Physical Education and Its Curriculum View [D]. Nanjing Normal University, 2004.