Under the background of the coexistence of highly differentiated science and highly integrated knowledge, education and scientific research have shifted from "vertical" exploration to "horizontal" expansion and integration, and discipline integration has gradually become a new research paradigm. In colleges and universities, teachers with single-discipline knowledge can no longer meet the demand for scientific knowledge innovation, and the multiple obstacles caused by the limited improvement of academic effectiveness, the dependence on disciplinary identity adaptation, and the lagging support of service connection have made the promotion of interdisciplinary scientific research cooperation among college and university teachers particularly urgent. In order to break down the barriers between the departments of interdisciplinary scientific research cooperation, we should make efforts to clarify the responsibility, maintain the cooperation network, and build a solid organisational guarantee, so as to promote the benign development of interdisciplinary scientific research cooperation.

Xiao Yuanyi, Wei Mengru. The Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration among University Teachers and Its Facilitation. Frontiers in Educational Research (2023) Vol. 6, Issue 31: 6-11. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2023.063102.

[1] Zeng Yue-Liang,Si Li. Interdisciplinary research co-operation: background, theoretical research and practical progress[J]. Library and Intelligence Work,2021,65(10):127-140.

[2] Liu, T.H.. The main barriers to teachers' interdisciplinary co-operation and their solutions[J]. Teaching and Management,2020,(33):59-61.

[3] Katja Müller, Tom Morton. at the German coalface: Interdisciplinary collaboration between anthropology and journalism[J]. Energy Research & Social Science, 2018,45:134-143.

[4] Wen Shaobao,Bi Ying. Governance of opportunism in university interdisciplinary research teams[J]. Higher Education Management,2015,9(05):63-66.

[5] Hu Xianjin,Xu Fenghua. Research on Disciplinary Understanding: Origin, Progress and Way Forward[J]. Educational Theory and Practice,2023,43(19):52-58.

[6] Zhang Ning,Yu Qing. Conflict and Harmony:Ecological Governance of Interdisciplinary Academic Organisations in Universities[J]. Jiangsu Higher Education,2016,190(06):31-34.

[7] Zhang Fengjuan,Xuan Yong. From "Separation of Evaluation and Construction" to "Promotion of Construction by Evaluation": Four Transformations of Useful Discipline Evaluation[J]. Jiangsu Higher Education,2022,(07):37-42.

[8] Huang Juchen. Uneven development:The logic, limitations and its response to the construction of first-class disciplines[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Science Edition), 2019,4 5(06):94-101+202-203.

[9] Feng Bing,Xie Ran. Reflection and Reconstruction of Discipline Evaluation in China under the Perspective of New Public Governance[J]. Degree and Graduate Education,2020(05):6-12.

[10] Changling Li, Yanxin Pai, Guoyang Rong, Qingqing Fan, Fengjiao Guo. Identification of interdisciplinary relevant knowledge combinations based on weak relationships in social media[J]. Intelligence Theory and Practice,2022,45(03):125-132.

[11] LI Chong,YU Huiying. Assessment of the Current Status of Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration in Higher Education Research Institutions - A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Four Domestic Institutions[J]. Shanghai Education Evaluation Research,2018,7(04):75-79.